Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Does this look okay? (Engine Build Related)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2006 | 04:05 PM
  #1  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default Does this look okay? (Engine Build Related)

I started putting in my rods and pistons today, and I got to number 5 before I noticed this. The rods on all of the pistons are slid all the way over to one side on the wrist pin so it's touching the pin boss. There is no gap. When torqued down, the rods won't slide at all on the wrist pins. Everything moves freely however, no binding that I can tell. Here are some pics. There is obviously nothing I can do to correct it, except order new pistons or machine these slighly. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!





Old 07-03-2006 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
DavidNJ's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Default

Rod looks offset...
Old 07-03-2006 | 05:29 PM
  #3  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Rod looks offset...
And by that you mean...? The rods are in the correct way I believe. The rods only move all the way to the side when the bolts are torqued down. With the rod caps nested in place and the bolts finger tight there is a small gap between the rod and the pin boss. After closer inspection, there appears to be a small gap between the rod and the pin boss, maybe a couple thousanths. I'll see if I can get a feeler gauge in there.
Old 07-03-2006 | 06:26 PM
  #4  
Beast96Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 3
From: Shreveport, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Ferocity02
And by that you mean...?
True LS1 rods are off set. I don't know if they are offset in the manner that your seeing, but I would try and flip one of the rods over and see if it centers it up. Technically, flipping it over should pull it back to the center instead of into the wall.
Old 07-03-2006 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
viewsonic's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
True LS1 rods are off set. I don't know if they are offset in the manner that your seeing, but I would try and flip one of the rods over and see if it centers it up. Technically, flipping it over should pull it back to the center instead of into the wall.
I think that's a good idea.

From the picture the rods do look offset.
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:01 PM
  #6  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
True LS1 rods are off set. I don't know if they are offset in the manner that your seeing, but I would try and flip one of the rods over and see if it centers it up. Technically, flipping it over should pull it back to the center instead of into the wall.
The only problem with that is that the one side of the rod has the chamfer to clear the fillet on the journal of the crank. If I flip the rods around, the rods will scrap on the fillet.

After messing around with the rods for awhile, I can see that they are not pressing against the pin bosses, but intsead "resting" on them. If the push the slide the rod over on the crank as far as I can, then there becomes a small gap of a couple thousanths. Not sure if this is enough or not. I know it would be ideal to have the rods centered on the wrist pins, but that may not be possible.
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:04 PM
  #7  
00transamnh's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Farmington NH
Default

"holy High Def Pictures Batman!"
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:05 PM
  #8  
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 145
From: Oceanside, Ca.
Default Rod offset

Looks to me like you have yourself a set of rods for a small block Chevy. Small block rods have an offset beam. Ls engines have the beams pretty well centered on the big end.

You are going to have to return those rods for the correct set for an LS engine.

Steve


Originally Posted by Ferocity02
And by that you mean...? The rods are in the correct way I believe. The rods only move all the way to the side when the bolts are torqued down. With the rod caps nested in place and the bolts finger tight there is a small gap between the rod and the pin boss. After closer inspection, there appears to be a small gap between the rod and the pin boss, maybe a couple thousanths. I'll see if I can get a feeler gauge in there.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:17 PM
  #9  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Steve - Race Eng
Looks to me like you have yourself a set of rods for a small block Chevy. Small block rods have an offset beam. Ls engines have the beams pretty well centered on the big end.

You are going to have to return those rods for the correct set for an LS engine.

Steve
They are Lunati Pro-Mod rods for and LS1 motor.
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:20 PM
  #10  
Beast96Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 3
From: Shreveport, LA
Default

Originally Posted by Steve - Race Eng
Looks to me like you have yourself a set of rods for a small block Chevy. Small block rods have an offset beam. Ls engines have the beams pretty well centered on the big end.

You are going to have to return those rods for the correct set for an LS engine.

Steve
Steve, the rods came out of a LSX 427 motor I had.(Which dosen't change things) BTW, don't people use the Eagle SBC rods in LS-1's all the time? I know I had a 383 with those in it at one time.
Old 07-03-2006 | 07:24 PM
  #11  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

I am betting the problem is due to the inboard pin bosses on the pistons instead of the regular style.

Man this really pisses me off. This wasn't an issue when everything was mocked in place.
Old 07-03-2006 | 08:27 PM
  #12  
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 145
From: Oceanside, Ca.
Default Pin clearance

I use inboard pin boss style pistons (FSR J&E) and have not run into that problem with Lunati LS Pro Billet rods or Crower titanium rods.

What you can do is take a bit off the offending wrist pin face of the rods to provide a bit more clearance. This is best done on a Bridgeport style mill or in a lathe with an expanding mandrel. You should be able to find a local shop to take care of that if you are not equipped to do the work yourself.

If you were closer, I'd take care of it for you.

Steve







Originally Posted by Ferocity02
I am betting the problem is due to the inboard pin bosses on the pistons instead of the regular style.

Man this really pisses me off. This wasn't an issue when everything was mocked in place.
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 07-03-2006 | 09:07 PM
  #13  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Steve - Race Eng
I use inboard pin boss style pistons (FSR J&E) and have not run into that problem with Lunati LS Pro Billet rods or Crower titanium rods.

What you can do is take a bit off the offending wrist pin face of the rods to provide a bit more clearance. This is best done on a Bridgeport style mill or in a lathe with an expanding mandrel. You should be able to find a local shop to take care of that if you are not equipped to do the work yourself.

If you were closer, I'd take care of it for you.

Steve
What about milling a little bit off the inside face of the pin boss? Any machining I do I would like to minimize the change in weight of the rotating assembly, seeing that it has already been balanced. Since aluminum is lighter than steel, the change in weight won't be as great. I do have access to a milling machine. I could knock off .050" or so from the rod or the piston. Any reasons you would machine the rods before the pistons, or vice versa?
Old 07-04-2006 | 11:53 AM
  #14  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Ttt
Old 07-04-2006 | 01:09 PM
  #15  
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 145
From: Oceanside, Ca.
Default Clearance machining

You won't end up taking a lot of material off the pin boss of the rods. Thus not a lot of weight.

Looking at the pistons, you will weaken them too much if you take .050" off them.

Also, you will find it much easier to fixture the rods for machining than the pistons.

Steve
__________________
Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Oceanside, Ca.
760-630-0450
web: www.raceenginedevelopment.com/
e-mail: race-engine-development@***.net
Old 07-04-2006 | 09:16 PM
  #16  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 8
From: Visalia, California
Default

Hope I don't have that problem with my pro-mod rods and diamond pistons!!!
Old 07-04-2006 | 09:48 PM
  #17  
Syclone354's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

is the thrust off on the crank? do you have to set that on the new style engines?
Old 07-04-2006 | 10:49 PM
  #18  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

It almost looks to me like you have the rod installed backwards. Pull that piston out and look at the connecting rod and bearings. I'm not certain about aftermarket rods but I know stock rods are chamfered on both ends because the rods are supposed to face a certain way when installed so that rod has to be machined to clear both even and odd bank cylinders. I would almost bet that is your problem. If it mocked up ok and was put together correctly then thats gotta be the problem.
Old 07-04-2006 | 11:04 PM
  #19  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by kossuth
It almost looks to me like you have the rod installed backwards. Pull that piston out and look at the connecting rod and bearings. I'm not certain about aftermarket rods but I know stock rods are chamfered on both ends because the rods are supposed to face a certain way when installed so that rod has to be machined to clear both even and odd bank cylinders. I would almost bet that is your problem. If it mocked up ok and was put together correctly then thats gotta be the problem.
As already mentioned, the rods are chamfered on one side only, they cannot be reversed or they will grind on the fillets on the crank journals. I agree if I could flip them around it would solve the problem, but I can't.
Old 07-08-2006 | 02:45 PM
  #20  
Ferocity02's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Ok, today I machined one of the rods down. I took it down .050" on the side that was giving me problems. When I put it back in, it was no longer touching the pin boss. There is now about .035" of clerance on the once problematic side, and about .070" on the other side. Does this sound okay? I'll post a pic ASAP, thanks!




Last edited by Ferocity02; 07-08-2006 at 03:00 PM.


Quick Reply: Does this look okay? (Engine Build Related)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.