I have the TR224/112 cam and I recomend at least a 230 cam. Gonna be swappin mine sometime soon.

 

Thats a pretty broad statement with no information to back it up.
This guy needs good info. Selecting a cam who's power band doesnt hit until mid to upper rpms might not be what he wants. Is he gonna turn his engine to 6800 rpms ? If your gonna say get at least a 230 duration you need to explain why in a street car why anyone would want an unuasable powerband and less torque.

example here: fm13 230/232 minimum torque was 312 ft lb, tr224/224 min torque was 321 ft lbs. Again these are mustang dyno numbers. Add 10 percent or so to get dynojet numbers.

 

Well he said he wants a cam that makes 400 rwhp. I've seen a few guys make those #'s with one but not the norm.

 

I would vote TR228 on X-ER lobes (or XFI?) on a 110+0, maybe a +1.

Most with a 224 want to go bigger, this is bigger. X-ER lobes aren't quite the ROUGHEST you can put your springs on, XFI are supposed to be better for spring life. This is also very streetable.

 

next weekend hopefully

 

some people want bigger than a 224 some dont. buddy has one in his auto and it has so much low end on the street its really nice. but some like more up top that run like a raped ape up top. but you loose some down low.

 

can any one plug the tr228 on that 110 +1,2,3,4 in the ve calc?
98 stock heads and gaskets

 

 

im running a 226-230 112lsa, geat driveability

 

TR TRAK great cam i driven it everyday for like three month and its great check it out. and it will easily give you 400+rwhp with the right bolt ons