Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hydraulic lifters and piston to valve checking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
ROCNDAV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

My understanding is that, assuming you aren't using adjustable rockers, you adjust the pushrods until your wipe pattern on the valve stem is correct. If you are using solid lifters for this test, you then add the desired preload amount to this amount.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #22  
frijolee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ROCNDAV
My understanding is that, assuming you aren't using adjustable rockers, you adjust the pushrods until your wipe pattern on the valve stem is correct. If you are using solid lifters for this test, you then add the desired preload amount to this amount.
Can you add a bit of detail to this? With check springs the lifters will be 100% extended all the time so we can think of them as fixed. Changing the pushrod length to anything other than zero preload (aka zero lash) should just force the valve open (Yes, I'm assuming and using standard rockers).

How do you adjust wipe pattern when using non-adjustable rockers in a normal configuration (no check springs)? I didn't know this was possible. If I'm thinking about this correctly the only variable is pushrod length which changes lifter preload not the position (via a new rocker angle) of the rocker tip to valve stem.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #23  
ShevrolayZ28's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

With hydraulic lifters we should determine pushrod length based on desired lifter preload, not wipe pattern.

If you want/need to change the wipe pattern you should raise or lower the rocker. (In most cases you don't need to. Certainly if you change valve stem length you would.)

That's my understanding.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #24  
ROCNDAV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Ok, so when using solid "test" lifters (no test springs), you simply adjust the adjustable pushrods until zero lash. Is the lingth of the adjustable pushrod your desired pushrod length? or do you add a lifter perload amount to this length?

If we don't add to this length, than I am assuming that the lifters are pumped up immediatley upon start up and stay pumped up the whole time? I originally assumed that hydraulic lifters were somewhat compressed a bit and only got "pumped up/extended" at high RPMs.

I've been reading so many articles and I think I have confused myself
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #25  
ShevrolayZ28's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by ROCNDAV
Ok, so when using solid "test" lifters (no test springs), you simply adjust the adjustable pushrods until zero lash. Is the lingth of the adjustable pushrod your desired pushrod length? or do you add a lifter perload amount to this length?

If we don't add to this length, than I am assuming that the lifters are pumped up immediatley upon start up and stay pumped up the whole time? I originally assumed that hydraulic lifters were somewhat compressed a bit and only got "pumped up/extended" at high RPMs.

I've been reading so many articles and I think I have confused myself
I read that the hydraulic lifter plungers travel about an eighth of an inch when the car is running. I think the idea behind the preloading is that we don't want the plungers to bottom out or top out too often if at all, they should stay in the middle of their range of travel.

Last edited by ShevrolayZ28; Sep 21, 2006 at 12:19 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #26  
frijolee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ROCNDAV
Ok, so when using solid "test" lifters (no test springs), you simply adjust the adjustable pushrods until zero lash. Is the length of the adjustable pushrod your desired pushrod length? or do you add a lifter perload amount to this length?
It would depend if your solid lifters are the same height to the pushrod seat as an the hydraulic guys. For a set of stock lifters modified to prevent internal travel your second statement is correct. Correct pushrod length = adjustable pushrod dialed to zero lash + desired preload.

Originally Posted by ShevrolayZ28
I think the idea behind the preloading is that we don't want the plungers to bottom out or top out too often if at all, they should stay in the middle of their range of travel.
Agreed. The lifter takes slop out of the system but it shouldn't travel much. If oil pressure pumps it up too far, your valve wouldn't close all the way and your engine would become inefficient very quickly.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 09:58 PM
  #27  
ROCNDAV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

OK, so I checked everything again. The pushrods were adjusted until I had zero lash (using my home made solid lifters). I removed the rockers, and measured the overall length, which was 7.200. I called Crane cams since I was using a crane adjustable tool. THey said whatever my overall measured length was plus my desired lifter preload would be the length needed. I believe .050" of preload is fine with new OEM lifters, correct? If so, then that means that I need a set of 7.250" hardened lifters.

Does anyone disagree?


This was some good reading on lifters:
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=faq&id=3


Frijolee, sorry again for jacking your thread.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #28  
frijolee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Rocndav,

I agree with your methodolgy. However, that seems really short to me conisdering the stockers are 7.400. Are you running decked heads, adjustable rockers or anything else that could explain the difference.

On my end I just installed my Futral F13 (230/232). I was annoyed to discover I had only 0.065 intake to with a healthy 0.130 on exhaust. My first thought was that I might be tooth off on the timing chain but I've checked it every way I know how and it looks good. What the heck's going on here? Do I need to retard timing (which would mean throwing down for an adjustable timing set...)?

Joel
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #29  
ROCNDAV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by frijolee
Rocndav,

I agree with your methodolgy. However, that seems really short to me conisdering the stockers are 7.400. Are you running decked heads, adjustable rockers or anything else that could explain the difference.

On my end I just installed my Futral F13 (230/232). I was annoyed to discover I had only 0.065 intake to with a healthy 0.130 on exhaust. My first thought was that I might be tooth off on the timing chain but I've checked it every way I know how and it looks good. What the heck's going on here? Do I need to retard timing (which would mean throwing down for an adjustable timing set...)?

Joel
my AFR 225's were milled for 66cc and my block was also decked (my pistons come out of the block .015 isntead of the usual .005-.008.

Did you get solid lifters, or make your own? try swapping the lifters and see if your readings change.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:56 AM
  #30  
hammertime's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 2
From: Smithton, IL
Default

Originally Posted by frijolee
You're basicaly measuring the p to v clearance at nominal lifter preload. With more oil pressure the lifter extends even further. As I see it this is WHY we need 0.080 and 0.100 clearance. Those numbers always seemed way to large to account for thermal expansion and tolerances of stretching parts.
You are perhaps forgetting additional clearance for valve float and/or over revs. If the spring cannot control the valve for one of these reasons, the additional clearance saves you from PTV contact. I doubt that preload makes up much, if any, of the recommended minimum clearance.

Great discussion here though!
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #31  
wastintime's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

Originally Posted by frijolee
This is a pretty good article. However, as I thought about it a bit more I wanted to clarify something about lifter preload.

According to the above: lifter preload is the amount the lifter can collapse due to the greater spring rate of the valvesprings (measured with the valve closed). It's worth noting that oil pressure must be absent to correctly measure deflection hence the bleed down period required.
I realize this is kind of an old thread, but I came across it doing some research for a build I'm doing at the moment.

First of all, NO, that is absolutely NOT what lifter preload is.

Here's an example, I'm doing an LS3 build. The hydraulic lifters have a maximum expansion of 3.20mm, so with 0 oil pressure they have to potential to compress 3.2mm. I say potential because the spring is keeping them expanded until you set preload. Factory preload spec is 1.58mm or .062" What that means is that you are compressing the spring in the lifter 1.58mm, so there is still 1.62mm of travel left in the lifter, which if you turn the motor over and the cam pushes against it, will compress. The problem with this is that, just like you imagined, if the motor was running it would absolutely not compress that last 1.62mm as it would be filled with oil allowing the valve to move farther i.e. less valve clearance.

Converting to inches and multiplying across a 1.7 rocker arm that's actually .108" difference. While I realize 102 to 108 isn't a huge difference, it could be depending on your exact preload spec, and that is really why it's so bad to check this with hydraulic lifters, it's very hard to know exactly what your preload is set at with any real precision especially multiplied across a rocker arm.

Having said that, if you subtract .105" from your measured valve clearance and you still have plenty, yes, you are probably fine. However, it is worth knowing that you could always lose valve clearance with lifter pump up, but... that's not going to matter whether you checked it with solid or hydraulic lifters.

I honestly don't see a huge problem checking p/v clearance with hydraulic lifters if you have all of the information and understand how they work, especially when you consider that the solid lifter measurement may not be as accurate based on your individual preload setting, and some people do change preload settings based on RPM requirements... higher RPM motors often get a little less preload, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 11:40 PM
  #32  
S_Sprouse's Avatar
Staging Lane
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 53
Likes: 2
From: Central Tx
Default

High 8s? Am I right?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2017 | 11:29 PM
  #33  
SMITTYS's Avatar
Teching In
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Plano Texas
Default hydraulic lifters

Originally Posted by frijolee
I'm still looking for a good theoretical explanation for how hydraulic lifters actually work.

From a few of the above responses I'm picturing a diaphram driven by both a preloaded spring (of lower rate than the valve spring) and by oil pressure (hence how slop is removed and the startup clatter goes away...) The combination of oil pressure plus spring is then sufficient to overcome the force required to open the valvespring and the lifter moves smoothly thereafter.
They work like shock absorbers.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2017 | 02:19 PM
  #34  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,293
Likes: 3,617
From: Central Cal.
Default

It's actually a piston inside the lifter housing that, when the valve is closed, has oil pressure push the piston up and keep the valve lash tight. When the lifter pushes up to open the valve, the captured oil keeps the piston in position until the valve closes again.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE