Results with ETP heads.
#281
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Notime383
Some stated that the intake (Fast) may not be the culprit, in Sean's tests, becaused he has cammed his set-up for LS2 LS6 Intake and possibly not the FAST!
#282
Originally Posted by Sean Collins
Your a moron. How do you lkike that. CF driveshafts are junk. FAST intakes aren;t far behind IMO. The data is there. Maybe you just read **** on the internet and assume it to be correct.
'Course I obliterated one aluminum shaft, too.
#283
why does every body talk so much crap in this thread?? Heres what we should do...Mr. Collins..dont know you, dont want to know you, but you should open up your dyno to people with the fast intake. Let them come in and do what they can do...Then..people who say the fast is great(i am one of them) think you should open up your dyno and let Mr. Collins come in and play around. Then see what comes out better..Thats just me....have fun....
#284
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sean Collins
Actually i think the fast has some serious design issues. Yes the camshaft isn't fast friendly but we have been seeing a trend with the FAST that indicates there are other problems affoot with that intake manifold. the Ls2 should hopefully perform very well but testing will tell the tale.Yes i am very happy with the results.
If you dont like the fast then get a plain jane LS6, but there are NO design issues what so ever with the FAST. Sounds like you have a small cam.
#285
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn i thought this thread was going to finally DIE.completely useless thread and someone should put DONT READ on the first post.otherwise if your really bored or sick as a dog like i am,and want to be mildly entertained,then start reading from the first post.