Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Results with ETP heads.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2006, 10:58 AM
  #281  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Notime383
Some stated that the intake (Fast) may not be the culprit, in Sean's tests, becaused he has cammed his set-up for LS2 LS6 Intake and possibly not the FAST!
"cammed" his setup for a LS6 intake? So he chose a cam that will make more power with less air instead of more air? Ummm, don't think so. That's actually funny. This whole thread is.
11 Bravo is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 12:02 AM
  #282  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
429 Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean Collins
Your a moron. How do you lkike that. CF driveshafts are junk. FAST intakes aren;t far behind IMO. The data is there. Maybe you just read **** on the internet and assume it to be correct.
I "lkike" my new and improved CF driveshaft even better than my first two, I hope it lasts longer.

'Course I obliterated one aluminum shaft, too.
429 Mustang is offline  
Old 12-29-2006, 01:23 AM
  #283  
Launching!
 
blue2000Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why does every body talk so much crap in this thread?? Heres what we should do...Mr. Collins..dont know you, dont want to know you, but you should open up your dyno to people with the fast intake. Let them come in and do what they can do...Then..people who say the fast is great(i am one of them) think you should open up your dyno and let Mr. Collins come in and play around. Then see what comes out better..Thats just me....have fun....
blue2000Z28 is offline  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:27 AM
  #284  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (18)
 
SHINER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Houston
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sean Collins
Actually i think the fast has some serious design issues. Yes the camshaft isn't fast friendly but we have been seeing a trend with the FAST that indicates there are other problems affoot with that intake manifold. the Ls2 should hopefully perform very well but testing will tell the tale.Yes i am very happy with the results.
LS6>LS2 (intakes)
If you dont like the fast then get a plain jane LS6, but there are NO design issues what so ever with the FAST. Sounds like you have a small cam.
SHINER is offline  
Old 01-18-2007, 02:53 PM
  #285  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
redtail2426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn i thought this thread was going to finally DIE.completely useless thread and someone should put DONT READ on the first post.otherwise if your really bored or sick as a dog like i am,and want to be mildly entertained,then start reading from the first post.
redtail2426 is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 03:37 AM
  #286  
Teching In
 
smp777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5w20
this guy is just pulling yalls chain
LMAO i think its his secret cam grind
smp777 is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:18 PM
  #287  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Jimmyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 1,574
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What a crock of **** !! The server for this thread needs Data De-duplication technology applied to it to pare it down to two pages vs. 8 !!
Jimmyz is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:40 PM
  #288  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

considering Collins is gone this thread can now die
jrp is offline  



Quick Reply: Results with ETP heads.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.