110 and under LSA/ICL/ECL
11-11-2006, 11:27 PM
#22
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1stz06
I am running Patrick G TQ cam on XER lobes 110+1. When I first installed it dot-to-dot it was pretty choppy but as Patrick would say very docile. I went back in and advanced it 4* and it really smooth things out, also pick up about 12 ftlbs through out the curve and about 5RWHP. I had a very large cam in previous to this one so this thing is very smooth in comparison. I got my car dyno'ed for the last time with this cam Friday with what I feel is a very good combo and put down 451/421. I can email you my Dyno sheet but it will not let me post it because it is in a TIF format. My car made 350RWTQ at 2500 and 360RWTQ at 3000!!!!
I have no drivability issues what so ever. Idle is set at 950rpms and I do not get any surging even at 55mph in 6th. I am very happy with the drivability of this cam.
I have no drivability issues what so ever. Idle is set at 950rpms and I do not get any surging even at 55mph in 6th. I am very happy with the drivability of this cam.
11-12-2006, 12:44 AM
#24
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really think its synergy of the parts to get to Pats numbers.
The cam angles are a byproduct of the valve events perhaps a better question would have been who is shutting the IV around 58 ABDC (seat numbers) or DCR in the 8.8+ range, just thought more would want to comment on the lower lsa's title.
I know there have to be some guys on here running around 106 even if it is a track only car.
The cam angles are a byproduct of the valve events perhaps a better question would have been who is shutting the IV around 58 ABDC (seat numbers) or DCR in the 8.8+ range, just thought more would want to comment on the lower lsa's title.
I know there have to be some guys on here running around 106 even if it is a track only car.
Last edited by 02sierraz71_5.3; 11-12-2006 at 12:58 AM.
11-12-2006, 02:58 AM
#26
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BADAIR
should I change the split too?
more exhaust
more lift?
more exhaust
more lift?
I'd go with more split. Probably 4-6 degrees between the intake and exhaust, but you may need to change duration too (lower) if going that route.
11-12-2006, 11:01 PM
#35
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, Tx.
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a Comp Custom Gring 230/230 .591/.591 110LSA +4 and i put down 388hp/377tq. Of course i found out a week later that the valvesprings I was running were VERY worn out. I put in new PRC gold duals and can definately feel a difference. I can't wait to re-dyno!
11-13-2006, 10:42 AM
#36
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LS1powerhouse02
I have a Comp Custom Gring 230/230 .591/.591 110LSA +4 and i put down 388hp/377tq. Of course i found out a week later that the valvesprings I was running were VERY worn out. I put in new PRC gold duals and can definately feel a difference. I can't wait to re-dyno!
11-14-2006, 01:39 AM
#39
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothing to special on mine..
Stock bottom end and 241's
Comp 232/238 .574/.586 112+4
Dyno #'s in sig .. Im still on a LS1 intake manifold ..
P.S- was dyno'd through an open cutout
Stock bottom end and 241's
Comp 232/238 .574/.586 112+4
Dyno #'s in sig .. Im still on a LS1 intake manifold ..
P.S- was dyno'd through an open cutout
