Is this possible? Smart people needed...
Right now I'm running a 1ohm resistor inline with the EWP (slowed it down 20% or so), I have a 160 degree thermo in with a 3/16" hole drilled in it, and a bit of water can pass through the cylinder head cross over pipes (I have the hole restricted to 3/16" or so). The car STILL overcools on the highway (goes below 1st mark on gauge). How is this possible?!?!?!
I would suggest installing a stock thermostat back into the car and see what happens.
[ December 12, 2001: Message edited by: 2quick4u ]</p>
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
#1, where are you measuring engine temperature? The location may need to be different if you are moving from normal to reverse flow cooling. Measuring the water being output by the heads in normal cooling will show very cool water if the flow is reversed.
#2, Cooling is not linear with flow. If the coolant is moving slower, it is able to gather mroe heat while in the engine and release more heat when its in the radiator. There *will* be some optimal speed, but the cooling function isnt linear with flow. I dont think a 3/16" hole would be enough necessarily to cool a car, but...
#3, With enough pressure, any amount of coolant can fit through a 3/16" hole ;-). It sounds like you really do need to reostat the voltage going to this pump so that you can run it more slowly when necessary.
besides, I aint smart. I jus' wuz raized rite.
Chris
[ December 12, 2001: Message edited by: Visceral ]</p>
I really do think that you arent necessarily cooling the heck out of the engine, just reversing the order of operations. Im beginning to think the engine is much hotter than you think...
chris
I really do think that you arent necessarily cooling the heck out of the engine, just reversing the order of operations. Im beginning to think the engine is much hotter than you think...
<hr></blockquote>
I can tell how hot the engine is running by turning on the heater. When its nice and hot, the thermo is open and the heater blows hot air out. When the thermo is closed (engine temp < 160 degrees), the heater does not work. Don't worry I spent a lot of time mapping the coolant flow, I know how the setup should be working. The only possible explanation is that 2 3/16" holes are enough to cool the motor, but that explanation fails the DIMS test. <img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">
It makes sense that the heads should show a cooler temp than the rest of the engine, but 30 degrees? I don't think so...
I'd love to check the water temp at the block, but I don't have ATAP. Hopefully soon.
I tried a 5w 0-5phm pot (biggest I could find), and the thing melted on me after 10 seconds. <img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0"> I'll throw another 1ohm-10w static resistor in the mix to see how things are going after work.
With reverse cooling, I believe the 2 holes you have can suffice. The reverse cooling keeps the heads so cool to begin with that even those 2 small orifices are moving enough coolant to overcool with a 160 stat. I have seen 160 stats start to open as soon as 130 degrees so that may be the contributing factor.
<hr></blockquote>
Thats a good point, if the thermo is opening sooner than 160 it migth be compounding the problem. I will have to check it, thanks.
Chris
Just wondering?
Well, you did say you had it reversed right? The temp might just be reflecting the cold temps coming out of the radiator, since it flowing to the heads first.
<hr></blockquote>
I've considered that, but as it stands right now the thermo never opens. I can only assume that is because the outlet temps of the block are not reaching 160 degrees, which appears to be the case looking at the temp gauge. Later today I'll slow the water pump down more and see what affect it has on the situation.
[quote]
BTW, why would you want the 160 stat? I have found they make better power around 200 degrees.
<hr></blockquote>
I've already ruined my stock stat so I'm using this because I have it. Once I have this setup the way I want, I'll be able to easily adjust the temp on the dyno and see what works best for me.
Have you sped up the EWP? the slower it moves thru the radiator, the more time it has to cool. if you speed it up the less time it spends in the radiator?
<hr></blockquote>
I'd rather slow it down than speed it up.


