Stepped Headers: Gimmick or Got to Have?
Those dynatechs look nice, but I'm wondering if the step will provide any gain to the average guy with bolt-ons or mild H&C package when compared with FLP, TTS, etc.
I talked to Julio,Billinsley and Dynatech and they all told me run the stepped along w/a 3in collector for my S2 LS6 setup.
I cant wait to have Mufflex make my 3in Y along w/the 3in intermed. to a 3in cutout to a 3in. single round Dynomax Race Magnum and 1 rear 3in tail pipe..
Lightweight and will flow excellent..
JS
and length ( old saved thread ).
http://ls1info.com/article.php?sid=62
<strong>Heard most of the gains at over 5000 rpms and it's more of a drag oriented header concept.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Any impression as to whether there would be a torque loss below say 4000 rpm from having the step increase in a diameter?
I couldn't tell you what they would do for a heads/cam setup.
Trending Topics
I saw your results...
I'm gonna make a setup that will be able to drop off the car QUICKLY if I wanna run open collector
I think on a H/C car shifting at 6800rpm the stepped will SHINE running just the collectors at the track?I can tell ya I will surely find out soon enough...
JS
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I'm thinking about a change to 3.5" collectors/Borla XR-1 3.5" mufflers later in the year. Hell, I may even change headers and go with the stepped tubes if it would pick the car up a little.
I'll wait and see what kind of results come from other 346cid heads/cam cars running the stepped headers.
I'm running S2 LS6 heads w/11.1cr and will shifting at 6800 to use the benifit of the stepped design.
Not to mention I want a big bore down the road and after seeing how much better Pains car did,I was convinced.
Now the guys I talked to told me a 3.5in collector is monsterous an really is good for a 422 or big big n20 car.
Who knows?
JS
<strong>Typically a 1.75" primary and a 3" collector are good untill about 475ish crank hp. Since JS is going with a stroker, he'll probably be well over 475 crank hp, so the step and 3.5" collector will really pay off then. Even the really fast stock cube motors are borderline though. If you want to get really technical, I'm sure whether you have a manual or auto, and what size stall and gears you have all make a difference as well. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Dang I did like 440rwhp (500 crank) and I have TTS headers with 1.75 primaries and 3" collectors... I think next time at dyno I will hit 465-470rwhp should I think about getting bigger headers? I have a 3"/3" into 3" orp, 4" catback with a 4" Dynomax Ultro Flow welded round muffler.
[ January 05, 2002: Message edited by: Bob Neese ]</p>
J.
My post of last night points out that engineers with lots of experience (BMW with the new M3, and recently, Borla with the Viper headers) are going with the equal length, "twisted" design, and don't always favor the straight and wide open approach.
Once someone proves (at the track) that a certain design header has an advantage over another, on two very similar cars, I'll switch tomorrow! Until then.............
Edited post to change the word "waste" to "spend". Cause I didn't mean that these headers are a waste. I've seen them in person and they look very nice. My point was that lots of new stuff/mods come out and it takes a while to prove their effectiveness.
[ January 05, 2002: Message edited by: ONYXSS ]</p>







