Which rockers
Cam is 224/230 on 115, 0.581"/0.591", but I wouldnt have any concerns about upping that to 0.610 or so via 1.75 rockers.
CNC'd Edelbrock 215cc heads as supplied by WestCoast Racing heads. My pistons have cutouts in them.
I cannot lift the valve covers, as my coils will foul my brake booster, so basically stock covers must be retained.
I'd also prefer non-adjustable for ease of fitment.
The Jesel SS series look nice, but I think they require substantial clearance mods ?
Could I find a 1.75 ratio rocker that will fit ? Or should I stick with 1.7...
Crane ? Comp camps ? Harland Sharp ??
Im already using Trickflow pushrods.
Any advice is appreciated.
I'd just like that extra bit of lift to take me over 600
I see Crane offer this in kit form, or as a set of 16 rockers/studs etc
Can I just buy the latter ?? At least, I dont need pushrods ?? ( Im on 7.4" )
Last edited by stevieturbo; Dec 15, 2006 at 06:07 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Or is the 0.624" lift I'd hit with regular 1.8's nothing to be concerned about ?
Do 1.8's have valve more valve cover clearance issues ?
Last edited by stevieturbo; Dec 17, 2006 at 06:29 AM.
http://www.sdpc2000.com/catalog/3082...ocker-Arms.htm
Also, I think the Crane's are 1.72 fully open.
I do want to be sure what I buy is right for me.
I wonder which would actually offer more useable lift....regular 1.75's or the crane 1.7's
By that I mean, which would hold the valve open more, for the longest time for more air to actually enter the cylinder to make best use of the heads airflow ?
The cranes are starting to get tempting...
I wonder which would actually offer more useable lift....regular 1.75's or the crane 1.7's
By that I mean, which would hold the valve open more, for the longest time for more air to actually enter the cylinder to make best use of the heads airflow ?
The cranes are starting to get tempting...
Look at his car, I think he may need to yank the motor to do a cam change.
Rockers are easy, and as a few guys seem to think the YT's ( including W2W, so I take it they know ) arent that good....I want to change them anyway.
The added spring pressure and poor wipe pattern can lead to excess wear on the valve guides. Don't get me wrong, the stock rockers are excellent for a factory rocker, but at the same time GM set them up based on tolerance stack-ups so they could be bolted in place and have acceptable guide wear over the life of the motor with the low spring loads they were using. Then we come along, put in honking valve springs and fast ramp cams and all bets are off. I found with the Cranes, due to the adjustability, I could tighten up the wipe pattern to right where it should be and it was consistent between each valve. In my opinion, this is one area a lot of guys overlook when building their motors.


