Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2002, 06:59 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
brendon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

I have had the cam for a while now and just recently installed the Hooker LT's. They are coated and I have a 3" y pipe w/ no cats. I reset my computer and have a 50 miles o it since then. I have finally done some slight a tapping and MAFT tuning. HOLY **** does this thing scream up top!!! <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> I am still runnning a bit lean, I need to go even richer with the MAFT. The low end power is about the same as with the stock manifolds due to the 3" y pipe which benefits i the upper rpm range. I richened up 2 clicks on the base and WOT and it feels a lot stronger, so hopefully it will keep getting even stronger as I get the air/fuel correct.


Is it normal for me to be so lean with the cam and headers? My only other mods are a lid, MAF ends, with a basically stock catback. I have the base set at 4 clicks rich, and the WOT 3 clicks rich and my Ltrims are still at 7-9 positive. I haven't done any WOT runs yet but I will tonight. Is it the MAF ends leaning me out that much or is that normal with a cam and headers?
Old 02-14-2002, 07:28 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

4 clicks rich with positive LTrims seems like a lot for just Headers & a cam. Make sure you don't have any leaks on the intake side. I'd try your stock MAF too and see how much that effects things.
Old 02-14-2002, 09:12 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Mike Hoffpauir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

Just as was said. I'd put on the stock Maf ends...you probably will be in the ballpark then.
Old 02-14-2002, 09:20 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
brendon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, NH
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

My L trims are very eratic at idle, more so than they have ever been before. I will check for a vacum leak, that could be the cause. I am going to put my stock MAF ends on but will I lose any performance with it, stock screen and all? I just did a few WOT runs, I had no KR and my o2's were between .935-.945 which is a bit rich so I went down a click on the WOT on my MAFT and will have to run it again. It feels really strong although I am sure that I lost some throttle responmse with the 3" y pipe and no cats, but it more than makes up for it up top.

Another thing I noticed today was that if I load the motor down around 2500 rpms and give it a lot of gas to accellerate, there is a grinding/ vibration type from under the car, could that be the y pipe hitting the floor board?
Old 02-27-2002, 05:37 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Ireland31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Hooker LT's w/ TR 224 cam impressions and tuning issues..

I just got my car back with a TR224 112 and Hooker LT's, 2.5" ORY and mine is running a bit rich. I have just a Lid, ported TB, and full exhaust. It is around .925 at WOT. Will descreening to MAF help lean it out a little? Im getting 27.5 degrees of timing at WOT. Thanks




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.