Poll: Bore or Stroke?
I chose stroke in my set-up, because I like the extra torque.
But as you said cost not an issue, the ideal set up is more bore then stroke. Faster revs with allowing the charge to get in quicker, a extreme example of that would be Formula 1 cars. Revs to the moon and makes power, but torque suffers due to lack of mechanical advantage.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
In the end my real advice is to build the biggest engine you can afford....less RPM required with displacement increases (helping longevity) and much more average power even though peak numbers (HP) migh be similar to a smaller engine. An all stroke 383 is much cheaper to build and can be a solid performing combination if built and set up properly (ask me how I know...). If your going to spring for a sleeved block just build a 427 or larger and be done with it....or pick up an LS2 block and build a dependable and affordable 402/408 combo which is another good bang for the buck.
Sometimes a smaller motor with less peak TQ is a desirable thing, but if your Jones'ing for big power and have the driveline that can handle the TQ, a well set up big inch build will put a huge smile on your face every time you roll it out of your garage
Maybe Dave will chime in here and share a little about the testing he did over a year ago....
Tony M.
You will increase the TQ wether you bore or stroke, but you will lose RPM's if you stroke.
In the end my real advice is to build the biggest engine you can afford....less RPM required with displacement increases (helping longevity) and much more average power even though peak numbers (HP) migh be similar to a smaller engine. An all stroke 383 is much cheaper to build and can be a solid performing combination if built and set up properly (ask me how I know...). If your going to spring for a sleeved block just build a 427 or larger and be done with it....or pick up an LS2 block and build a dependable and affordable 402/408 combo which is another good bang for the buck.
Sometimes a smaller motor with less peak TQ is a desirable thing, but if your Jones'ing for big power and have the driveline that can handle the TQ, a well set up big inch build will put a huge smile on your face every time you roll it out of your garage
Maybe Dave will chime in here and share a little about the testing he did over a year ago....
Tony M.
sorry tony, i just could not stop myself
so how is the beast? still breaking driveline parts?
I have been wondering about doing a resleeved ls1 block 370 to use the stock crank for now. The heads I have can support that nicely(nitrous motor) I could go for the iron block, but I want to keep the weight down and wont be spraying more than a 200. That could work for now, then later on, all I would need was a larger crank to do 400+ cubes and some bigger heads....
My decision would be if I sprung for more cubic inches would be pay for the block to be resleeved or buy a crank to make a 383?








