Who's a numbers junkie? HP/TQ ?
02-22-2002, 02:54 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who's a numbers junkie? HP/TQ ? I'm having a debate with a co-worker and have a bet on the outcome.
What are the official numbers for these various years of SS if the car is Y2Y equipped? This would be assuming the additional hp with the SLP catback systems like 2OTL or D/D.
1998 (320hp)(tq?)
1999 (325hp)(tq?)
2000 (330hp)(tq?)
2001 (335hp)(tq?)
2002 (335hp)or(345hp w/lid)(tq?)
Also, what is the factory compression ratio for the LS1? Isn't it 10.1:1?
Please correct my list if any of the numbers are wrong.
What are the official numbers for these various years of SS if the car is Y2Y equipped? This would be assuming the additional hp with the SLP catback systems like 2OTL or D/D.
1998 (320hp)(tq?)
1999 (325hp)(tq?)
2000 (330hp)(tq?)
2001 (335hp)(tq?)
2002 (335hp)or(345hp w/lid)(tq?)
Also, what is the factory compression ratio for the LS1? Isn't it 10.1:1?
Please correct my list if any of the numbers are wrong.
02-22-2002, 09:06 PM
#3
Re: Who's a numbers junkie? HP/TQ ? I think it's `98-`00 (320hp std) 330hp with the dual/dual; torque is 345 ft-lbs (SS).
on `01-`02 (325hp std) it's 335hp with the dual-dual or center mount; torque id 350 ft-lbs (SS).
`02 (325hp std) it's 345hp with d/d or center mount and lid; torque is 350 ft-lbs (SS).
compression is 10.1:1 all years.
[ February 22, 2002: Message edited by: Kdubroc 99 SS ]</p>
on `01-`02 (325hp std) it's 335hp with the dual-dual or center mount; torque id 350 ft-lbs (SS).
`02 (325hp std) it's 345hp with d/d or center mount and lid; torque is 350 ft-lbs (SS).
compression is 10.1:1 all years.
[ February 22, 2002: Message edited by: Kdubroc 99 SS ]</p>
02-23-2002, 02:27 PM
#5
Re: Who's a numbers junkie? HP/TQ ? The 98-99 SS was rated at 320 hp but the dual/dual claimed a 7 hp gain or 327 hp, not 330 hp.
I'm not sure what the 00 SS claimed with dual dual.
SLP would told me the dual dual was worth ten but they underrated it, due to GM not wanting the fbody cars too close to the vettes 345 rating.
I'm not sure what the 00 SS claimed with dual dual.
SLP would told me the dual dual was worth ten but they underrated it, due to GM not wanting the fbody cars too close to the vettes 345 rating.
