Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
#1
Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
With that shitty looking Mac y-pipe outta the car, it really looks like a POS. I am thinking that with a set of ported Macs and a custom 3 inch y-pipe, I could pull some Longtube power gains out of them no problem....
#2
TECH Addict
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fort Worth,TX
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
[quote]Originally posted by Damian:
<strong>With that shitty looking Mac y-pipe outta the car, it really looks like a POS. I am thinking that with a set of ported Macs and a custom 3 inch y-pipe, I could pull some Longtube power gains out of them no problem....</strong><hr></blockquote>Some guy said he picked up power doing that setup.Dont know how much though.My pipe looks good to me except the fact that its so dam small.I have a 4inch mufflex exhaust with no cats and I want at least 3-4 not 2 1/2-4.
<strong>With that shitty looking Mac y-pipe outta the car, it really looks like a POS. I am thinking that with a set of ported Macs and a custom 3 inch y-pipe, I could pull some Longtube power gains out of them no problem....</strong><hr></blockquote>Some guy said he picked up power doing that setup.Dont know how much though.My pipe looks good to me except the fact that its so dam small.I have a 4inch mufflex exhaust with no cats and I want at least 3-4 not 2 1/2-4.
#3
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Re: Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
I'd only bother w/ a 3" y-pipe if you're pushing some serious power. The 2.5" y will flow really well up to a point. (somewhere around 430+ RWHP) It would definitely be worth replacing Mac's crappy collector w/ a Flowmaster unit, though.
#4
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
I have decided to keep my 2.5" Y-pipe. I will be getting a 3" Flowmaster collector, however. I decided to use the MAC Y simply because I don't plan on doing heads (want a T1 though) so I figured it would flow well enough for what I am planning on doing. I won't be running cats either so that will help out.
#7
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Freeland, MD
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
[quote]Originally posted by Chris ARE 360:
<strong>MTI 422 made 500RWHP with the MAC headers and stock Ypipe.
Chris</strong><hr></blockquote>
Chris,
Who's car was that? I know of one 422 setup here that did push those numbers, and then had a 15-20 RWHP jump when switched to the Dynatech stepped headers.
<strong>MTI 422 made 500RWHP with the MAC headers and stock Ypipe.
Chris</strong><hr></blockquote>
Chris,
Who's car was that? I know of one 422 setup here that did push those numbers, and then had a 15-20 RWHP jump when switched to the Dynatech stepped headers.
Trending Topics
#9
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burlington ON Canada
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Really worth going to a 3 inch Y over the Mac 2.5?
I'm running a 3" Y, but have never ran the 2.5" for comparison. Sorry, I guess I'm no help. <img src="images/icons/confused.gif" border="0">