I must be lost, I thought I was in a tech forum....

 

[quote]Originally posted by Visceral:
<strong>must be. <img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">

Something tells me that on this board, you are gonna have a hard time convincing folks to go take the time to measure their vacuum so that you can shake their $hit around...

so yeah. Guess that 229 is the perfect, Terry.

rock on.

\chris</strong><hr></blockquote>

lol!

 

No siding here, but i think this is a good way to get a more comparable reference to idle quality, of each cam. Most of us Tech fans understand that increased compression will boost vacuum readings and hi elevation will affect readings also. This vacuum info will standardize comparisons, i say the more responses the better.

 

Or we can just go with....

[quote] Something tells me that on this board, you are gonna have a hard time convincing folks to go take the time to measure their vacuum so that you can shake their $hit around...

so yeah. Guess that 229 is the perfect, Terry.

rock on.

<hr></blockquote>

LoL

 

must be. <img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">

Something tells me that on this board, you are gonna have a hard time convincing folks to go take the time to measure their vacuum so that you can shake their $hit around...

so yeah. Guess that 229 is the perfect, Terry.

rock on.

\chris

 

I'll measure mine when I am at ARE next week
226/234 cam on 112LSA with just under 11:1 comp.
thanks,
Chris

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Terry Burger:
<strong>TTT, so far we have a list of one. I guess the MMS 229v2.1 is the best idling cam out there?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nope I got ya beat <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> . Can I prove it.......no

 

Terry I think u forgot that my CARTEK 224 Cam
produces 1in MORE vacum than your GIANT 229 CAM at 925 compared to your 950 idle <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

JS

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
Terry I think u forgot that my CARTEK 224 Cam
produces 1in MORE vacum than your GIANT 229 CAM at 925 compared to your 950 idle
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My idle is set at 875-900rpm. At the time I measured 15.5" out of gear, it was at 890rpm actually. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> It sounds like your cam is the same size as mine in terms of idle quality?

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
Nope I got ya beat . Can I prove it.......no
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just throw a vacuum gauge on there, or someone tell us how to convert from pressure to inches of merc. I'm too lazy to look it up. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> I'm sure your car pulls more vacuum, I'm just trying to get a list going. I want to know where the TR 224 112 and 114ls cams fall compared to the MMS 224v3.1. I want to know where the ARE split patter cams fall. I want to know where the C1 cam falls. It will be a good tool for the members of this board to use when comparing cams.

 

JS what is your CR?

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Terry Burger:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
Nope I got ya beat . Can I prove it.......no
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just throw a vacuum gauge on there, or someone tell us how to convert from pressure to inches of merc. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I bring my car out this Saturday. I will see what I can do.