Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Found The Right Cam For Sure! I AM DONE!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:46 AM
  #61  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

Originally Posted by BOWTIE
In addition, it seems that most of the big shops which are using the LSK lobes are using them primarily on the intakes only (TRAK, Torquer V3, MS4 just to name a few).
These cams all have something in common: they don't do very well with cheap headers. The basic theme of these all along has been a lot of people getting less than expected results and being told it's because they need Kooks, QTP, etc.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 06:01 AM
  #62  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

Bout time you decided to step into the man forum over here!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #63  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by BOWTIE
Keep in mind if you go with the LSK lobes, you can forget the 918's. You will need a good set of dual springs. That said, I would still do it at least on the intake side. The way I see itm using the LSK lobes is like using a larger XER lobe with out penalizing your DCR. Because even though a 228 XER and 228 LSK lobe give the same values at .050, and consequently roughly the same DCR, at .200 the LSK is several degrees larger then of course you get more peak lift as well. The only question I have is whether or not it is beneficial on the exhaust. I have seen several post claim that the exhaust does not really benefit from the extra lift the LSK's provide and I have yet to see one of the more reputable guys on the forum dispute that. In addition, it seems that most of the big shops which are using the LSK lobes are using them primarily on the intakes only (TRAK, Torquer V3, MS4 just to name a few). For this reason I have just about decided on a cam almost identical to yours, but with an XER ex lobe. Now I just need to see about who to order it through as well. Here is what I am planning 228/234 LSK/XER .639/.598 LSA 110 +2 (still not sure if I want to get the advance ground in or not but most likely will). I hope to use this cam with a set of ported heads.

even i was going to run the XE-R lobes... i was still gonna do a dual spring set up. I want the added insurance.

I jsut can not decide now if i want XE-R or LSK Lobes
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #64  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Bout time you decided to step into the man forum over here!

LOL thanks Jordan. external Engine was getting to easy
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #65  
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 2
Default

I can't wait to hear that exhaust with a healthy cam . I just got the same mufflers in 2.5" to go on my duals.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #66  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
I can't wait to hear that exhaust with a healthy cam . I just got the same mufflers in 2.5" to go on my duals.

yeah it should sound pretty mean
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:12 AM
  #67  
BOWTIE's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: AUSTIN TX
Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
These cams all have something in common: they don't do very well with cheap headers. The basic theme of these all along has been a lot of people getting less than expected results and being told it's because they need Kooks, QTP, etc.
Well if that is true, I should NOT have any problems... Kooks Jet Hot coated, stainless, stepped, 1 3/4 - 1 7/8. I think the intake may figure into the equation as well. I think if I were planning on running a ported Fast 90, I would either take a few degrees of duration off of the intake or add several to the exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #68  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

Sweet. You should have a nice setup.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #69  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
LOL thanks Jordan. external Engine was getting to easy
Yeah, I think you have it mastered. Are you doing the swap yourself?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #70  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Yeah, I think you have it mastered. Are you doing the swap yourself?

LOL, yea i think i mastered the External Engine!!!!

going to have a speed shop do it. Getting into the internals is something i dont trust my self with...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 04:28 PM
  #71  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
Getting into the internals is something i dont trust my self with...
You should try it yourself, its not so bad. Its even easier if you remove the engine from the bottom first.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #72  
bad6as's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

ive been looking in to the same size cam
for me a
227/232 lsk/xer on a 109+0
with a set of tsp 2.5 5.3l or their 243 style i cant decide.

but for me i went with this cam do to the shift point. im gonna shift at 6500 so if it falls on its face after 6600 i dont care because it wont see it.
and i do not want to cut the pistons

but the 5.3L vs. the ls6 heads is killing me

Last edited by bad6as; Jan 20, 2007 at 09:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #73  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

I'd add a little more exhaust to that cam. Can the 228 XE-R exhaust lobe do the job with a 227 LSK intake lobe?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #74  
bad6as's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

sorry i ment 232
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #75  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
I'd add a little more exhaust to that cam. Can the 228 XE-R exhaust lobe do the job with a 227 LSK intake lobe?

you told me to do the same thing but forgot what was what. Can you retype the info? I know you sent it to me on a PM i was cleaing out the box and i deleted it


Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 08:08 PM
  #76  
1BADAIR's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 1
From: oxford, Michigan
Default

where would a 242 248 .610 .615 110+2 peak roughly?
IVC would be 49
25 degree's of overlap
It would raise my DCR from 7.6 to 8.56( switching to .040 cometic too)
switching from a 246 248 .614 .615 114
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #77  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

Good old Trex, huh?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #78  
Asmodeus's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 1BADAIR
where would a 242 248 .610 .615 110+2 peak roughly?
IVC would be 49
25 degree's of overlap
It would raise my DCR from 7.6 to 8.56( switching to .040 cometic too)
switching from a 246 248 .614 .615 114
How are you getting over an 8.5 dcr with the t-rex and cometics? what heads are you running and how much have they been milled? what size valves? in anything other than stock configuration, you know you'll need to have the pistons flycut right?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:07 PM
  #79  
KurtRardin's Avatar
TECH Addict
Veteran: Marine Corps
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 4
From: Gainesville, GA
Default

With as much attention that the 228/232 has been getting im suprised that so few sponsors stock it. What, isnt LM the only one that does? PredatorZ got me into the 228/232 .588/.595 110+4 a long time ago. It seems that im the dude that keeps chiming in saying "yeah im going to do that too", but i still havent. Maybe since TSP keeps lowering the price of their 918 cam kit I'll actually get around to it. $579!!!

Good luck with the crazy cam that you've got lined up. Its awesome to have LS1Tech as a resource because you can get some great advice on a custom cam thats set up to the exact RPM that you blow the tires off. If you were looking for a cam that peaks out at 2000 rpms, takes a nose dive from 2001 to 3500 then picks back up violently to 9000rpms im sure someone could hook you up here. lol
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.