What's the limit of the LS1?
Considering:
the LS6 intake is used
idle quality and mpg is not a concern
money no object
<strong>What do you all think is the most RWHP/RWTQ that a N/A LS1 could put down.
Considering:
the LS6 intake is used
idle quality and mpg is not a concern
money no object</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm not sure, but I'll let ya know <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
SOOOOOOOON <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<small>[ March 25, 2002, 08:24 AM: Message edited by: LEO ]</small>
[QB]N/A the most I've seen is an MTI 422 solid-roller set up which made 540 rwhp. It is a C5, the car belongs to SW.
_________________________________________________
Was this the black Vette that ran the 9.99 or something like that? And didn't he use NOS for that run as well?
I heard that the most limiting factor of the LS1 is the intake, what can be gotten from the LS1 with an after market intake? In the 600's maybe.
[QB]600s are possible.
__________________________________________________
Wouldn't a 600 RWHP N/A car at full weight run low 9's and maybe even 8's?
Trending Topics
[QB]Quickin, the LS6 intake is definitely the restriction @ the 500+ rwhp. Yes it is SW's car that I'm talking about - on NOS he makes 750+ rwhp. The LS1 intake restricts power even at the heads/cam level.
__________________________________________________
I'm getting a ported LS6 intake with my ARE 436, will my engine be restricted? What if I wanted to go with the most radical cam as opposed to the more mild cam I selected, would it have breathing problems?
Thanks
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also, my only concern w/the LS1 is how well the stock Aluminum block will hold up against high HP over an extended time.
<img border="0" alt="[Chevrolet]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
<small>[ March 26, 2002, 12:01 PM: Message edited by: z28pwr ]</small>
At full weight? Probably high 9s. Think of my car, add 70-80 RWHP, and then add 600 lbs.
<small>[ March 26, 2002, 12:08 PM: Message edited by: Colonel ]</small>
<strong>How about a super-stroker with TT's?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Aaaaaahhhhhhhh . . . the Lingenfelter 427 TT <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
<strong>[QUOTE]Originally posted by Quickin:
[qb]How about a super-stroker with TT's?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Aaaaaahhhhhhhh . . . the Lingenfelter 427 TT <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
__________________________________________________
If Lingenfelter wasn't such an AMAZING rip-off it would be great.
What does his 427 TT put down anyway? RWHP/RWTQ
<small>[ March 27, 2002, 03:51 PM: Message edited by: Toxic Texan ]</small>
<strong>Don't those LPE 427 TT's cost like $50,000 for just the motor?
10.1, 9.20's, jeez that's quick.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">$30 large for just the 427 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="gr_emb.gif" />
I have a vid of the 427 TT runnin' what appears to be a bolt-on Viper . . . it's UGLY <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
9.5 at 145 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> 427 TT

