Static Compression Calculation
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Static Compression Calculation GM claims that the factory LS1 has a 10.1 compression ratio. When I plug the numbers into my compression calculator I always wind up with 10.2 on the nose. Wondering if any of you might have some ideas why there is a discrepancy? Here are the numbers I am using to calculate compression ratio on a stock LS1 (346CI):
Bore: 3.898"
Stroke: 3.622"
Cylinders: 8
Rod Length: 6.098"
Deck Height: 9.240"
Head Chamber Volume: 66.67cc
Head Gasket Bore: 4.0"
Head Gasket Compressed Thickness: .0523"
Piston Compression Height: 1.3380"
Piston to Deck Clearance: -0.0070"
Volume Above Top Ring: .9370cc
I know a tenth of a point is not much but I'm curious why this is happening?
Bore: 3.898"
Stroke: 3.622"
Cylinders: 8
Rod Length: 6.098"
Deck Height: 9.240"
Head Chamber Volume: 66.67cc
Head Gasket Bore: 4.0"
Head Gasket Compressed Thickness: .0523"
Piston Compression Height: 1.3380"
Piston to Deck Clearance: -0.0070"
Volume Above Top Ring: .9370cc
I know a tenth of a point is not much but I'm curious why this is happening?
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
It shouldn't vary on a factory LS1 unless the block decks (or heads) have been milled and/or the pistons replaced with ones having a different compression height. From what I understand the factory piston extends out of the bore (into the combustion chamber) .0070", effectively reducing the combustion chamber volume by 1.37cc.
Originally Posted by Jiver67
It shouldn't vary on a factory LS1 unless the block decks (or heads) have been milled and/or the pistons replaced with ones having a different compression height. From what I understand the factory piston extends out of the bore (into the combustion chamber) .0070", effectively reducing the combustion chamber volume by 1.37cc.
I measured mine so i could care less, I know what mine is but my block is not near stock. I have my factory block still though too, maybe Ill go measure it sometime this weekend. Ill report back later.
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Yeah, .005" to .008" is a very small amount...could be caused by a number of things. I'm guessing slightly out of spec factory tolerances could account for the difference as well as thermal cycling on a used motor.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
I'm probably being too **** here but that tenth of a point is driving me crazy!
Compressed gasket thickness is certainly a variable too. If I plug in .050" I get 10.25, with a .045" gasket 10.38.
Compressed gasket thickness is certainly a variable too. If I plug in .050" I get 10.25, with a .045" gasket 10.38.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
Originally Posted by Jiver67
I'm probably being too **** here but that tenth of a point is driving me crazy!
Compressed gasket thickness is certainly a variable too. If I plug in .050" I get 10.25, with a .045" gasket 10.38.
Compressed gasket thickness is certainly a variable too. If I plug in .050" I get 10.25, with a .045" gasket 10.38.
You wont get an accurate measurement unless you actually measure everything. 
My understanding is that the factory tolerance on the deck height was 9.235-9.245.
Of course that only makes things more complicated.
I think the point is that the factory has a range of tolerances on most aspects, which means that if they wanted to be completely accurate with their stated compression ratio that it would be given as a range, not a single number.
Of course that only makes things more complicated.
I think the point is that the factory has a range of tolerances on most aspects, which means that if they wanted to be completely accurate with their stated compression ratio that it would be given as a range, not a single number.
Last edited by GIGAPUNK; Feb 2, 2007 at 02:11 PM.
