Anyone running 220 @ .050"?
Anyone running 220 @ .050"? I've been trying search for the last couple days, and I can't seem to get it to work. So who has ran one and what was the setup?
XE, XE-R, LSK?
110, 112, 114?
Seems it would make for a great street cam with an efficient high flowing head.
XE, XE-R, LSK?
110, 112, 114?
Seems it would make for a great street cam with an efficient high flowing head.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
I have a crane 220-224 which is actually a 282-286 on a 114 with 0.551 lift.
Works well. I wouldnt want power much further up the RPM scale. It will pull itself along idling 800rpm in 3rd gear so torque is pretty good.
The fast90 made a big difference. Go for 1.8 rockers to get the lift up and all should be well.
Ive got the 1.8's... just need to fit them.
Works well. I wouldnt want power much further up the RPM scale. It will pull itself along idling 800rpm in 3rd gear so torque is pretty good.
The fast90 made a big difference. Go for 1.8 rockers to get the lift up and all should be well.
Ive got the 1.8's... just need to fit them.
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
One of my favorites is 220/220, .581/.581 115+0 (stealth I by MTI)
But it can be improved nowadays
But it can be improved nowadays
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
One of my favorites is 220/220, .581/.581 115+0 (stealth I by MTI)
But it can be improved nowadays
But it can be improved nowadays
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Well since you have ported heads, meaning you can run thinner gasket and mill, I would work on maximising your SCR/DCR.
Since you are 6 speed, meaning you want it to pull nicely into the rpms I wouldn't touch the LSA/ICL but I would cut it on LSK lobes instead of XE-R to get more under the curve.
@ .050 on paper it would be a 219/219 .632/.632 115+0, but in reality once cut it will be more of a 220.x/220.x
since you're putting heads then changing lifters to cadillac or LS7s would not be an issue.
that thing would make a pretty nice flat curve
Since you are 6 speed, meaning you want it to pull nicely into the rpms I wouldn't touch the LSA/ICL but I would cut it on LSK lobes instead of XE-R to get more under the curve.
@ .050 on paper it would be a 219/219 .632/.632 115+0, but in reality once cut it will be more of a 220.x/220.x
since you're putting heads then changing lifters to cadillac or LS7s would not be an issue.
that thing would make a pretty nice flat curve
How would a 219/223 lsk cam perform on a 110 or 112? I'm thinking it might peak a little to early on a 110, but a 112 + 0 should pull well past the peak for a good shot of low end torque and still have an IVC of 42 for a decent amount of top end.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
