G5 cam specs
05-11-2002, 04:49 PM
#1
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G5 cam specs A friend of mine put his G5 on a cam doctor, and the results were
224 230 .580 .570 112ls. The intake lobe is pretty aggressive, and the exhaust lobe is less aggressive.
224 230 .580 .570 112ls. The intake lobe is pretty aggressive, and the exhaust lobe is less aggressive.
05-11-2002, 04:54 PM
#3
Re: G5 cam specs </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by bLuE11secTA:
<strong>YOUR OFF A LITTLE ON THE LIFT NUMBERS</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I doubt it since the cam was put on a cam doctor. Lift can vary .002-.003 from what is desired and what the final grind ends up as.
<strong>YOUR OFF A LITTLE ON THE LIFT NUMBERS</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I doubt it since the cam was put on a cam doctor. Lift can vary .002-.003 from what is desired and what the final grind ends up as.
__________________
05-11-2002, 05:47 PM
#5
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs The duration sounds right...matches the cam card that comes with them. The lift I'd heard was a little higher, but cam doctors dont lie.
I'm suprised nobody has used a digital caliper on the lobes before now anyways. I measure all my cams now to verify the proper lift.
I'm suprised nobody has used a digital caliper on the lobes before now anyways. I measure all my cams now to verify the proper lift.
Trending Topics
05-11-2002, 07:19 PM
#8
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs That is all I know. Of course if it comes with a cam card then that is probably at least as accurate. I'm surprised no one posted the specs if they came with cam cards, lol. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
05-11-2002, 07:46 PM
#11
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs We were supplied with a vague cam card with partial info, but we were asked by Lou not to disclose any of that info, so on that note, all the purchasers stayed quiet to respect his wishes.
Joe
Joe
05-12-2002, 04:46 AM
#15
TECH Addict
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fort Worth,TX
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Terry Burger:
<strong>A friend of mine put his G5 on a cam doctor, and the results were
224 230 .580 .570 112ls. The intake lobe is pretty aggressive, and the exhaust lobe is less aggressive.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Its like thunders but with more lift.I mean alike in the duration aspect of the cam.Thanks Terry I owe you one. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong>A friend of mine put his G5 on a cam doctor, and the results were
224 230 .580 .570 112ls. The intake lobe is pretty aggressive, and the exhaust lobe is less aggressive.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Its like thunders but with more lift.I mean alike in the duration aspect of the cam.Thanks Terry I owe you one. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
05-12-2002, 10:40 AM
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Terry Burger:
<strong>That is all I know. Of course if it comes with a cam card then that is probably at least as accurate. I'm surprised no one posted the specs if they came with cam cards, lol. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Terry nothing suprises me about YOU though. U just always have to go and spoil someone elses fun. It seems like you lerk in all the threads and wait for someone to say something just so u can start ****. Everyone knows Lou wanted some time without the specs posted. If HE was ready he would have posted them. There are several posts up now about the cam. He is still tweaking tuning and such. Point is you start way to much crap. I'm not siding with JS or ANYONE. I mind my own damm business. I rarely post like this, and I may not even be a big fan of the cam myself yet, but that's no reason for you to decide Lou's time is done. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />
<strong>That is all I know. Of course if it comes with a cam card then that is probably at least as accurate. I'm surprised no one posted the specs if they came with cam cards, lol. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Terry nothing suprises me about YOU though. U just always have to go and spoil someone elses fun. It seems like you lerk in all the threads and wait for someone to say something just so u can start ****. Everyone knows Lou wanted some time without the specs posted. If HE was ready he would have posted them. There are several posts up now about the cam. He is still tweaking tuning and such. Point is you start way to much crap. I'm not siding with JS or ANYONE. I mind my own damm business. I rarely post like this, and I may not even be a big fan of the cam myself yet, but that's no reason for you to decide Lou's time is done. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />
05-12-2002, 01:03 PM
#17
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G5 cam specs </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by The Booker man:
<strong>Its like thunders but with more lift.I mean alike in the duration aspect of the cam.Thanks Terry I owe you one. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You need to look again. The Thunder Racing cam is 230 Intake duration / 224 Exhaust duration. The LSA is 111 degrees.
The G5 cam specs posted are 224 Intake duration / 230 Exhaust duration. The LSA is 112 degrees.
These cams have almost nothing in common except the fact that they both fit in LS1 engines.
<small>[ May 12, 2002, 01:06 PM: Message edited by: Geoff ]</small>
<strong>Its like thunders but with more lift.I mean alike in the duration aspect of the cam.Thanks Terry I owe you one. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You need to look again. The Thunder Racing cam is 230 Intake duration / 224 Exhaust duration. The LSA is 111 degrees.
The G5 cam specs posted are 224 Intake duration / 230 Exhaust duration. The LSA is 112 degrees.
These cams have almost nothing in common except the fact that they both fit in LS1 engines.
<small>[ May 12, 2002, 01:06 PM: Message edited by: Geoff ]</small>