Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ramp rate/valve spring ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2007, 02:51 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ramp rate/valve spring ?'s

Does the closing rate of a cam effect valve springs(or any of the valvetrain) as much as opening ramp rate? IE will a cam with a mildly aggressive opening ramp that snaps shut quickly(aggressive closing ramp) effect valve springs like a cam with an aggressive opening ramp would?


More specifically, does closing rate effect valve float as much, more less than opening rate? What about lifter bounce?

Last edited by eLTwerker; 02-09-2007 at 03:20 PM.
Old 02-09-2007, 04:22 PM
  #2  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eLTwerker
Does the closing rate of a cam effect valve springs(or any of the valvetrain) as much as opening ramp rate? IE will a cam with a mildly aggressive opening ramp that snaps shut quickly(aggressive closing ramp) effect valve springs like a cam with an aggressive opening ramp would?


More specifically, does closing rate effect valve float as much, more less than opening rate? What about lifter bounce?
what's your cam specs?
Old 02-09-2007, 10:19 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is just a hypothetical question really. Here's an example, though. All things being equal(valvetrain, heads, etc..) will cam A with a XE lobed opening and aggressive closing rate have the same effect on valve float, wear, etcc.. as cam B with an XE-R lobed opening and a more mild closing rate. Assume same mild ramp rate on opening of cam A as closing of cam B just to furthur keep things equal.
Old 02-09-2007, 11:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
mike#9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well......I thought that the XER was a more agressive ramp???
Old 02-09-2007, 11:28 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eLTwerker
This is just a hypothetical question really. Here's an example, though. All things being equal(valvetrain, heads, etc..) will cam A with a XE lobed opening and aggressive closing rate have the same effect on valve float, wear, etcc.. as cam B with an XE-R lobed opening and a more mild closing rate. Assume same mild ramp rate on opening of cam A as closing of cam B just to furthur keep things equal.
1. XE-R's have more lift for a given duration than an XE, hence more aggressive for given durations.
2. The ramp rate both opening and closign will affect springs.
Old 02-10-2007, 10:22 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
mike#9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
1. XE-R's have more lift for a given duration than an XE, hence more aggressive for given durations.
2. The ramp rate both opening and closign will affect springs.
I thougt that he had it backwards
Old 02-10-2007, 11:58 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
1. XE-R's have more lift for a given duration than an XE, hence more aggressive for given durations.
2. The ramp rate both opening and closign will affect springs.
Not entirely true, look at .006 VS .200 of same duration in XE VS XE-R
What do you see?

Old 02-10-2007, 02:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah well I thought Comp defined XE-R as .006-.050= 49 or lower and XE as 53 or higher. I thought XE-R lobes are more aggressive in general, maybe not at every single point(except .050-which defines the lobe).




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.