Any differences between 1998 and 2002 short blocks
09-09-2002, 03:38 PM
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any differences between 1998 and 2002 short blocks I was wondering what were the differences between a 98 LS1 and 2002 short blocks??? Is one stronger than the other?? I have a chance to pick up a 2002 short block to replace my 1998 short block.
09-10-2002, 06:38 AM
#2
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any differences between 1998 and 2002 short blocks I seem to recall reading that the 01-02 blocks use LS6 pistons with some sort of coating to help wear along the cylinder wall along with some new type of piston ring to help with oil consumption. As for the actual block composition... I don't think they'd be different, but I don't know for sure.
09-10-2002, 02:26 PM
#5
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Any differences between 1998 and 2002 short blocks My understanding is the 01-02 blocks are LS1 blocks and the late 01 cars and 02 cars got a different oil ring and a coating on the LS1 pistons.
09-10-2002, 03:40 PM
#6
Re: Any differences between 1998 and 2002 short blocks </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> "GM re-designed the block in 2001 to imrove lower end breathing, and reduce windage. This was acomplished by machining in a rectangular window at the base of all 8 cylinder bores. (see PIC). The reason for the change was to reduce oil consumption, and allow the engine to rev quicker." <img src="http://server103.hypermart.net/stevesegal/camaro/i-3_T.JPG" alt=" - " /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Quote from Valvegod
