Does anyone have a dyno graph of the TR224 vs the TR220 on a similar car?
09-24-2002, 12:58 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have a dyno graph of the TR224 vs the TR220 on a similar car? I'm trying to decide on a cam, and I've searched a lot of the threads discussing the 220 and the 224, but I'm not sure what I want to do.
I have an A4, and for the time being I'm going to be running with my stock 2.73 rear. Because the TR220 gives up less at the low end, and because I have to pass emissions, I'm really leaning toward the TR220 right now.
At the same time, I want to make sure I'm not "shortchanging" myself by getting a 220 over a 224.
I'd like to see where the powerbands come in and exactly how much power one gives up to the other at what RPM.
Oh, and it will be on a 114LSA. This I have already decided, because of 1) emissions and 2) I'd rather have a wide powerband.
One other thing: should I consider the MTI B1 cam as well? How does it stack up power-wise against the 220?
Thanks for humoring me. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Mark
I have an A4, and for the time being I'm going to be running with my stock 2.73 rear. Because the TR220 gives up less at the low end, and because I have to pass emissions, I'm really leaning toward the TR220 right now.
At the same time, I want to make sure I'm not "shortchanging" myself by getting a 220 over a 224.
I'd like to see where the powerbands come in and exactly how much power one gives up to the other at what RPM.
Oh, and it will be on a 114LSA. This I have already decided, because of 1) emissions and 2) I'd rather have a wide powerband.
One other thing: should I consider the MTI B1 cam as well? How does it stack up power-wise against the 220?
Thanks for humoring me. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Mark
