915 springs?
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is anyone using these, or know anything about them? Are they a new part #?
The shop that will be installing my cam said these are what they are using since the 918 recall. Will they be sufficent for a 222/222 .563 112 cam? thanks.
The shop that will be installing my cam said these are what they are using since the 918 recall. Will they be sufficent for a 222/222 .563 112 cam? thanks.
#3
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks Evil. Anyone else? This shop is a sponsor and they know what they are doing. I just never heard of these springs.
<small>[ October 03, 2002, 04:53 PM: Message edited by: XFiveLiter ]</small>
<small>[ October 03, 2002, 04:53 PM: Message edited by: XFiveLiter ]</small>
#4
TECH Resident
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think most people around here will agree they're a good stock replacement spring, but nothing to use on a fairly high lift cam. Try a search on this forum for the 915 springs... Should find what you're looking for..
Trending Topics
#8
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had them on my car when I had the T1 cam.. They did not last a week. I put 941's on and my car ran like a monster.. The 915's did not break, but they became weak faster than you can say boo.. I would have to say go with the 918's. Comp Cams were suppose to pay me back for the 915's and never did..
#9
TECH Resident
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by EVIL:
<strong>comp says they are good to 600 lift.
my cam is small at 544 lift, so thats why i got them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">They are still a weaker spring. Not good at the high revs.
XFiveLiter, go with the 918's. They seem to have fixed their "bad batch" problems. New 918's are now marked with a blue stripe.
<strong>comp says they are good to 600 lift.
my cam is small at 544 lift, so thats why i got them.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">They are still a weaker spring. Not good at the high revs.
XFiveLiter, go with the 918's. They seem to have fixed their "bad batch" problems. New 918's are now marked with a blue stripe.
#10
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks guys <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> I'm gonna see if they can get some 918s, maybe they're on back order or something <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> I'd rather wait a little longer then use inferior springs <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
Dan99Valvesprings, thanks for the confusion <img border="0" alt="[Banging Head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" />
Dan99Valvesprings, thanks for the confusion <img border="0" alt="[Banging Head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" />
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've got the 915s but my cam is only a .537 lift and has moderate ramp rates. Lift is not the only thing to consider when selecting springs. I wanted the lightest weight springs that I could use. Easier on the valvetrain, and also quieter.