TR 224/224 .561/.561 112 vs. Comp Cams 224/224 .563/.563 112
10-03-2002, 11:19 PM
#1
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
TR 224/224 .561/.561 112 vs. Comp Cams 224/224 .563/.563 112 Ok... I realize the numbers are the same... but seems that there's always more than just numbers...
is ramp speed another consideration?
Regardless I think i'll go with a TR cam now since they're a sponsor.. but i'm curious on what makes the two cams listed above different (other than 2 thousandths lift)
is ramp speed another consideration?
Regardless I think i'll go with a TR cam now since they're a sponsor.. but i'm curious on what makes the two cams listed above different (other than 2 thousandths lift)
10-03-2002, 11:37 PM
#3
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
Re: TR 224/224 .561/.561 112 vs. Comp Cams 224/224 .563/.563 112 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 99 Black Bird T/A:
<strong>If the Comp Cam is ground with XE-R lobes it will have a hair faster ramps.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">XE-R? damn.... i'm confused again <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<strong>If the Comp Cam is ground with XE-R lobes it will have a hair faster ramps.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">XE-R? damn.... i'm confused again <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
