CNC LS6 or Stage II LS1 Heads?
<small>[ October 21, 2002, 06:51 PM: Message edited by: 35THSSLE ]</small>
Now, if you are larger than stock cubes (346 ci+) then I would recommend the LS6 heads, because with the increased airflow and ci, the split in performance difference and HP/$ is going to start becomming very apparent. Many people with larger than stock ci, pushing the big numbers run some form of the LS6 porting.
Good Luck
The LS6 heads mentioned above are coming out cheaper than a quality pair of Stage II LS1 heads. About $2000 assembled with no core charge! Just want to make sure I am not missing something critical here.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
A .030" cut should raise your compression by a half-point or so, & is still very streetable, at least on 93 octane.
SDPC sells two versions of the LS6 ported heads. One version is not milled at all and can be customized any way you like. The other version is milled .055 to create 60 CC chambers and about 10.8:1 - 11:1 compression. Not sure if I should buy the assembled milled heads or start with the ported bare heads and have them milled .030 ???
Vince-
I think the 110 LSA would be too rough.. and the stock Z06 cam w/ 117 LSA too mild. Will have to find something in the middle... Maybe a TR 220 114 LSA cam wouldn't be too bad with the Ls6 heads?
Good choice! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Cheers,
Chris
Hi
about the heads , you must find some bodies tried the heads you choice it .
My advice. you will be find in the MTI and GTP the best ported and CFM with LS1 or LS6 , maybe the MTI is busy in this time but you can go with GTP
About the cam , if you M6 go with 112 or less but with 112 is better for the daily drive , is rough but not too much
if you have A4 go with 114
About your cam is too small ....why ??
Thanks.
Fahad..
<small>[ October 22, 2002, 09:06 AM: Message edited by: Fahad ]</small>
Thanks for your help guys...now on to the cam selection....
Part # SD4825
Head: 5.7L "243"
Mods: CNC
Valve intake: 2.00
Valve exhaust: 1.55
Intake runner volume: 243
Chamber: 70 CC (before any milling)
Flow specs @ 28 inches of H20
Bench used: SF 1030
Bore Size: 4.030
Valve Lift Intake Exhaust
.100 66 55
.200 140 112
.300 210 163
.400 256 192
.500 291 213
.550 304 218
.600 307 222
<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
The LS6 CNC ported heads 2.00/1.55 from SDPC look very attractive as does a good set of Stage II LS1 heads 2.02/1.57 from MTI or GTP. Cam will probably be in the 220-224 range with .55X-.56X lift. Does anyone have a guess at which will put down better numbers at the dyno/track.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My guess is the MTI or GTP heads would put down better numbers at the track and on the dyno. I also think the TEA Stage 2 5.3 heads will put down better number track and dyno than the SDPC heads will and be very competive with MTI or GTP powerwise. In cost per hp the TEA's are going to be very very hard to beat.
The TEA Stage 2 5.3's have a proven track record and if you get in on a GP the price is better than the LS6 heads for similar results. To my knowledge the TEA's have show as much as 440rwhp in Verbs car. I suggest you contact TEA and talk with Brian Tooley before making your final decision.
Best wishes on your H&C package.







