941s or 918s ???
226/226 .591/.591 113
I have had the 918 for about 3000 miles with the T1 and another cam that was around .580 lift with no issues.
Thanks! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[Camaro]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
JMHO....
<small>[ October 25, 2002, 04:22 AM: Message edited by: SSG--Z28 ]</small>
See later bro, when you coming back to the islands?
Dan <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
I have been using the 918s on my car for a while, and had no problems, but I think I am selling them with my BSM heads.
My friend had a set of almost new 941s with the tit retainers, so I grabbed them from him. I decided to go with the 941s vice the 918s based on some good logic from Alan at FMS (cam maker).
He said, "given the choice, I'd go with the 941s over the 918s. This way, if a spring does break, the inner damper will keep the vlave from falling into the piston in most cases. If you break a 918, there is nothing there to hold the valve up."
Made sense to me!
Todd
Trending Topics
<img border="0" alt="[Camaro]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Katech had a bullient out that showed the 918's don't do as good a job controling the valve train at high rpm as the 941's do. Katech also stated the 918's have the most problems controllng the valve train at 6,400 rpm.
On Thunder Racings website, they list the new REV dual springs that will work without machining the heads.
I'd want dual springs with the big cam myself.
<small>[ October 26, 2002, 11:26 PM: Message edited by: 99 Black Bird T/A ]</small>





