Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2002, 01:20 PM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,060
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Man that's like asking a group of guys which set of ***** is the nicest. Everone will have a different choice <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Old 10-25-2002, 03:06 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Well.... I would not say something excessively large <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> , but not small...... o wait were talking about cams <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Old 10-25-2002, 03:09 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
FatZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cleburne,Tx
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

"Man that's like asking a group of guys which set of ***** is the nicest. Everone will have a different choice"

Well Said!!
Old 10-25-2002, 06:14 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fenris Ulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

By definition a cam that has the "best" horsepower won't have a broad torque curve <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 10-25-2002, 06:33 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
02 'Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Out of Texas, into Tucson, AZ
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Reckless:
<strong>Man that's like asking a group of guys which set of ***** is the nicest. Everone will have a different choice <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">****, those Coors Light "Twins"

they're the best.
Old 10-25-2002, 09:06 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
Brian-GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Thunder Racing made 455/418 on a 346 https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...1;t=008127;p=2
Old 10-26-2002, 12:01 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Brian-GTP:
<strong>Thunder Racing made 455/418 on a 346 https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...1;t=008127;p=2</strong>[/Q UOTE]

*cough* shortbelt *cough* <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Old 10-26-2002, 12:34 AM
  #8  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Not considering idle quality but sheer horsepower and torque what is the best cam? Something that produces a nice broad torque curve and good hp?
Phillip
Old 10-26-2002, 05:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Reckless:
Man that's like asking a group of guys which set of ***** is the nicest. Everone will have a different choice </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is an experiment I'm willing to try. I think with enough practice/research we could come up with a common choice. Someone want to set it up? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

If it were me and I were building a H/C 346 I would definitely look at one of the TR reverse split cams and GTP heads. The dynos I see from these setups are consistently impressive.
Old 10-26-2002, 08:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Jason99T/A:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by verbs:
<strong>*cough* shortbelt *cough* <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">And your point is? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> The shortbelt is worth 2hp.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I saw a car do back to back pulls, and consistantly had about 6-7rwhp or so more peak. Maybe it was variance I saw then. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />

So I got a few questions for you Jason.

First, if the shortbelt mod is worth 2rwhp, then why even bother doing it? Sounds pretty pointless to me to go to the trouble on the dyno for a measily 2rwhp.

If it does only give 2rwhp, then why would he even bother listing it as one of the mods he had on the car when he dynoed??

That'd be like me adding the Fernco hose mod when telling everyone my basic mods.

Second, why is it that everyone I've seen do it at the track gains .1/1mph or so. Does this mod give like 20rwhp down low but only 2rwhp up top? If this mod does only give 2rwhp (assuming across the board), then there'd be no way people would be gaining .1/1mph at the track from it.
Old 10-26-2002, 09:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Country Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by verbs:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Jason99T/A:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by verbs:
<strong>*cough* shortbelt *cough* <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">And your point is? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> The shortbelt is worth 2hp.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I saw a car do back to back pulls, and consistantly had about 6-7rwhp or so more peak. Maybe it was variance I saw then. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />

So I got a few questions for you Jason.

First, if the shortbelt mod is worth 2rwhp, then why even bother doing it? Sounds pretty pointless to me to go to the trouble on the dyno for a measily 2rwhp.

If it does only give 2rwhp, then why would he even bother listing it as one of the mods he had on the car when he dynoed??

That'd be like me adding the Fernco hose mod when telling everyone my basic mods.

Second, why is it that everyone I've seen do it at the track gains .1/1mph or so. Does this mod give like 20rwhp down low but only 2rwhp up top? If this mod does only give 2rwhp (assuming across the board), then there'd be no way people would be gaining .1/1mph at the track from it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">and how about using a FULL exhaust. Not just header "extensions". I want to see muffler(s) and all.
Old 10-26-2002, 09:37 PM
  #12  
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
 
Jason99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by verbs:
<strong>I saw a car do back to back pulls, and consistantly had about 6-7rwhp or so more peak. Maybe it was variance I saw then. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></strong>

We have done back to back testing with the shortbelt on quite a few cars. The most we ever saw was 3hp peak and most see between 1-2hp.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>First, if the shortbelt mod is worth 2rwhp, then why even bother doing it? Sounds pretty pointless to me to go to the trouble on the dyno for a measily 2rwhp. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></strong>

The customer wanted the car dynoed as he raced it on the street or at the track. That was the main reason for the shortbelt. Also, all his previous dynos were with the shortbelt. So, we didn't want to introduce any other variables in the dyno by not running it.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>If it does only give 2rwhp, then why would he even bother listing it as one of the mods he had on the car when he dynoed??</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"></strong>

To most people, the shortbelt is considered a "dyno trick". He included it because he wanted everyone to know what was done to achieve the numbers he posted.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Second, why is it that everyone I've seen do it at the track gains .1/1mph or so. Does this mod give like 20rwhp down low but only 2rwhp up top? If this mod does only give 2rwhp (assuming across the board), then there'd be no way people would be gaining .1/1mph at the track from it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">If people are seeing .1/1mph from the shortbelt, something can't be right. I and many others have ran back to back at the track and all have seen less than .05/.5mph gain. On my car, it hardly made a measureable difference.

All the above cars I mentioned were running an ASP crank pulley. Was the car running a stock crank pulley when he saw 6-7rwhp with the shortbelt?

<small>[ October 26, 2002, 11:12 PM: Message edited by: Jason99T/A ]</small>
Old 10-26-2002, 09:39 PM
  #13  
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
 
Jason99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Country Boy:
<strong>and how about using a FULL exhaust. Not just header "extensions". I want to see muffler(s) and all.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Chris's car was dynoed with his 3" y-pipe and through a wide-open Borla. He was not running open headers w/ extensions. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Old 10-26-2002, 10:12 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Since all of our Stage II heads have almost the same flow numbers, then the RWHP obtained is dependent on the parts that are put around it. With that being said, I think Verbs made 440 RWHP with the TR 230/224 which is the highest RWHP H/C we have seen. So my vote would be on that cam, you would probably have to flycut the pistons to go any bigger. My 2 cents. Did the GTP car that made 455 RWHP have a TR cam?
Brian @ TEA
Old 10-26-2002, 10:15 PM
  #15  
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
 
Jason99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Brian Tooley:
<strong>Did the GTP car that made 455 RWHP have a TR cam?
Brian @ TEA</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Brian, the car with the GTP S2 heads had the TR230/224 cam.
Old 10-26-2002, 10:24 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

I see a pattern. It seems that the TR 230/224 must be THE CAM, for now. The only way it could have been better is if we had come up with it. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 10-26-2002, 11:04 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Brian Tooley:
<strong>So my vote would be on that cam, you would probably have to flycut the pistons to go any bigger.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I disagree (unless you mill the heads. I had .85 clearance with a .010 mill job...I'm sure you could setup it up to a 232/226 or something like that on unmilled heads.
Old 10-26-2002, 11:09 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Jason99T/A:
<strong> All the above cars I mentioned were running an ASP crank pulley. Was the car running a stock crank pulley when he say 6-7rwhp with the shortbelt?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah stock pulley. I didn't see pulleys listed in his mods so I assumed they were stock. I figured if you are gonna mention a measily 2rwhp shortbelt mod in there, he'd for sure be mentioning that he had pullies as well. Regardless, his cars a beast, especially with the bulky rear end....some more small mods (carbon fiber driveshaft, alum flywheel, ported TB etc...could land him in the 460's which would kick major ***!!
Old 10-26-2002, 11:12 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

I didn't know what kind of clearance you got with that cam, .085" is good, thats why I said probably. You should have milled your heads more maybe?
Old 10-26-2002, 11:16 PM
  #20  
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
 
Jason99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?

Matt, that's kind of what I figured on the pulley. Bypassing the power steering with a stock crank pulley on the car will probably see a few extra hp/tq over a car with an ASP since it was not being underdriven with the stock crank pulley in place.

Chris's car had a ported TB and an ASP crank pulley, but stock driveshaft and flywheel.


Quick Reply: What is the best HP and Torque cam for a H & C 346 LS1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.