Benefits of larger valves
This is for a set of 5.3 heads. Heads came with 1.89" instake and 1.55" exhaust valves stock. Heads are having minor port work and polishing done on the runners. Heads will be used with a relatively low lift cam (Comp 212/216 .522 .529 114). The seats should support up to a 2.02" intake, but I was thinking of just using a set of stock 2.00" LS1 valves. I need to have a valve job done anyway, so going to a 2" intake valve shouldn't be that big of a deal.
Anyone have an opinion or info for me? Anyone have a set of new stock LS1 valves?
The larger valved heads (2.055/1.60) setups have had the stock valveseats machined out and replaced with larger diameter seats which can be opened up. Smaller valves are said to help out port velocity and lower rpm torque, larger valves tend to favor higher rpm flow.
-Tony
<strong>... Smaller valves are said to help out port velocity and lower rpm torque, larger valves tend to favor higher rpm flow.
-Tony</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thanks Tony. This makes some sense to me. These heads are for a 5.3 truck. Would I be better off sticking with the stock valve size just for the torque? I need all the torque I can get.
Richard
If a larger intake valve will increase my low end, I'm interested.
You will lose flow with the smaller 1.900" intake valve compared with the 2.00" LS1 5.7L, although the 4.8L intake seat can accomodate up to a 2.02" intake valve. This will require substantial work with enlarging the seat and unshrouding the chamber to fit in the 2.00" valve.
I would use a 5.7L head and mill the surface .030-.040" to bring the chamber down to 64-65cc. To answer your question, yes, larger valves will improve flow, particularly in the low to mid lift range (Up to .15 times valve dia.) Larger valves will not improve flow in the higher lift range if the port is not also enlarged. In this case, the 5.7 and 4.8L ports are the same.
Paul J.



