Torquer V2 vs TR224
04-08-2008, 09:12 AM
#61
This may be a total dur-dur question, but what about a compromise between the TR224 and the TV2? Like the Texas-Speed 228R (228/228 .588/.588). I want a cam that will work as well as possible with ported heads, but the car is a DD in alot of stop/go traffic. M6/3.70 rear.
04-08-2008, 04:22 PM
#64
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I daily drive my TV2 and don't have any problem with it. The tune makes it perfectly drivable. I went for a 114 LSA too. I also have the 4.10 gears, there's no shortage of Low End... hehe
(And no shortage of top end either cause the RPM bump to 6600 keeps 172mph redline in 5th)-Dan
04-08-2008, 04:42 PM
#65
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your low end sucks you need to either get better gears or get a bigger stall. Who cares what power it makes below 2500 rpms you should never be in that range anyway. Unless your races last all of two seconds the car with the better top end is going to walk on bye and then you will wish you went with tv2!
04-08-2008, 05:51 PM
#66
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plainfield, CT
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torquer is a piece of **** cam. He has a better cam now. He will put down <350rwtq with the torquer. Might pick up 5rwhp up top, but loose 20rwtq.
And WTF with the old *** thread.
And WTF with the old *** thread.
04-08-2008, 06:03 PM
#68
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-08-2008, 06:11 PM
#69
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
-Dan
