5.3, torquer v.2
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
anyone got this setup. just curious to know what kind of numbers anyone got out of it. this is the way i plan on goin PRC 220cc 5.3L Stage 2.5 CNC Ported Heads and the torquer v.2. thinkin of makin the cam a split lobe to. anyone got any feedback bout this setup. good or bad.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Regginator
not tryin to hijack but how high should you spin the motor with this head/cam setup? would shifting at 6400 be good enough?
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Good cam on a 112+2 with those heads and your M6 (4.10:1).
To:whitesmoke
Sorry to highjack,butsince my friend has that cam.I thought he would put more rwhp than me so i thought it would be an intersting comparison
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by whitesmoke00
im always up for some comparison john. glad to get some insight on the numbers. hijack it anytime
#13
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have that setup and put down 410 rwhp and 365 tq. I feel like it should be more but I am having some other issues. Trying to figure out a rough idle and shuddering at 2100 rpm. Aside from that, I really like the setup, drivability is good. The power is really felt at 3000 rpm and above.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#14
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you want to find out results power wise, go sniff in the dyno section.
The 112+2 will have an earlier powerband, more overlap, more power in the band and a higher DCR.
the reason it is a +2 and not a +4 is your M6, likes to rev a bit higher.
The 112+2 will have an earlier powerband, more overlap, more power in the band and a higher DCR.
the reason it is a +2 and not a +4 is your M6, likes to rev a bit higher.