Patrick G tuned my TRAK cammed, PRC LS6 2.5's car. Results inside
07-31-2007, 07:17 PM
#21
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mt. Airy MD
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
umm 346 inches doesnt make 455 lbs of torque on a mustang dyno, unless its a silly correction factor that Im not aware of. We have the same dyno, Im pretty familiar with it. 470/450 on ours would trap 130 easy full weight
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
07-31-2007, 07:53 PM
#22
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AshWS6
umm 346 inches doesnt make 455 lbs of torque on a mustang dyno, unless its a silly correction factor that Im not aware of. We have the same dyno, Im pretty familiar with it. 470/450 on ours would trap 130 easy full weight
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
Last edited by ZetaVeinteOcho; 07-31-2007 at 07:58 PM.
07-31-2007, 10:00 PM
#26
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: AUSTIN TX
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steveo346
there was no need to touch his pistons on this setup......reat numers petey pablo.....rudy and i are here patiently waiting for you to take us for a spin....dan helped?....haha j/k dan
yeah rudy did a good job putting this setup together and props to patricio guerra for the sweeeeet tune....cant wait to see this bad boy at the track......vroom vroom boom!!! there goes the stock 10bolt....hahahaha
yeah rudy did a good job putting this setup together and props to patricio guerra for the sweeeeet tune....cant wait to see this bad boy at the track......vroom vroom boom!!! there goes the stock 10bolt....hahahaha
08-01-2007, 11:04 AM
#28
Originally Posted by AshWS6
umm 346 inches doesnt make 455 lbs of torque on a mustang dyno, unless its a silly correction factor that Im not aware of. We have the same dyno, Im pretty familiar with it. 470/450 on ours would trap 130 easy full weight
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
Im sure its making great power, but thats a little off in numbers, not that they mean anything to begin with
I was thinking the same thing but didn't want another dyno fight. But it will be neat to see the trap speed.
08-01-2007, 12:42 PM
#31
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mission Valley, TX
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will clarify the dyno numbers. I have been working on my dyno calibrations so they will report dynojet numbers but was not finished. Because everyone wants to see dynojet numbers. Several shops do this with their mustang dynos, that is why when some report mustang dyno numbers they can be confusing (some high/some low).
I have proven my mustang dyno numbers with my adjustment to be within 1-2rwhp on a dynojet. On Petes graph above, we wanted to give him a graph that would be similiar to a dynojet, but since I did not have the calibration 100% complete we told him that his graph is a little on the high side and it should be around 465/448. If Pete puts it on a dynojet those are the numbers he will see.
So if anyone has issues with the numbers above come to me and try to keep his thread clean. I have been working with the Mustang Dyne rep on making the dyno report dynojet numbers. Soon I will have the abilty to report mustang numbers and dynojet numbers.
Kurt
I have proven my mustang dyno numbers with my adjustment to be within 1-2rwhp on a dynojet. On Petes graph above, we wanted to give him a graph that would be similiar to a dynojet, but since I did not have the calibration 100% complete we told him that his graph is a little on the high side and it should be around 465/448. If Pete puts it on a dynojet those are the numbers he will see.
So if anyone has issues with the numbers above come to me and try to keep his thread clean. I have been working with the Mustang Dyne rep on making the dyno report dynojet numbers. Soon I will have the abilty to report mustang numbers and dynojet numbers.
Kurt
Last edited by 98Aggie; 08-01-2007 at 04:34 PM.
08-01-2007, 12:50 PM
#32
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
Its not their dyno's its their air. I think they have nitrous in the air down there.I wish... we normally have 4800-6000DA's up here (3200ft actual elevation), really sucks for racing N/A. Everyone knows all the good N20 air is down in Houston.
BTW nice numbers.
08-01-2007, 03:02 PM
#35
Originally Posted by -Joseph-
Great results man! I thought only the small runner heads made big torque?
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
08-01-2007, 03:38 PM
#38
Originally Posted by -Joseph-
That 2nd post wasn't me Patrick, I guess I should remember to log out after lunch.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
08-01-2007, 04:08 PM
#39
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BOWTIE
Just out of curiosity, did you measure the p/v clearance? I am running almost the identical setup and was just curious how close it was going to be. I will be running the same gaskest with the stage 2.5 5.3's and a similar cam except with 228 int duration and a 110 LSA. Also, do you know what intake center you guys installed that one at?
That's something Rudy will have to answer. I believe he knows the answer to both. Hopefully he will chime in.
08-01-2007, 04:11 PM
#40
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 98Aggie
I will clarify the dyno numbers. I have been working on my dyno calibrations so they will report dynojet numbers but was not finished. Because everyone wants to see dynojet numbers. Several shops do this with their mustang dynos, that is why when some report mustang dyno numbers they can be confusing (some high/some low).
I have proven my mustang dyno numbers with my adjustment to be within 1-2rwhp on a dynojet. On Petes graph above, we wanted to give him a graph that would be similiar to a dynojet, but since I did not have the calibration 100% complete we told him that his graph is a little on the high side and it should be around 465/448. If Pete puts it on a dynojet those are the numbers he will see.
So if anyone has issues with the numbers above come to me and try to keep his thread clean. I have been working with the Mustand Dyne rep on making the dyno report dynojet numbers. Soon I will have the abilty to report mustang numbers and dynojet numbers.
Kurt
I have proven my mustang dyno numbers with my adjustment to be within 1-2rwhp on a dynojet. On Petes graph above, we wanted to give him a graph that would be similiar to a dynojet, but since I did not have the calibration 100% complete we told him that his graph is a little on the high side and it should be around 465/448. If Pete puts it on a dynojet those are the numbers he will see.
So if anyone has issues with the numbers above come to me and try to keep his thread clean. I have been working with the Mustand Dyne rep on making the dyno report dynojet numbers. Soon I will have the abilty to report mustang numbers and dynojet numbers.
Kurt