TR224 114/AFR 205's a good match up?
08-02-2007, 07:19 PM
#21
Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
Okay, dont mean to hijack this thread, but you can run a head and cam pkg, stand alone without ANY other supporting mods? Im from cali so dont even mention long tubes! would a stand alone head and cam pkg pass smog?
08-02-2007, 09:56 PM
#22
Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
Okay, dont mean to hijack this thread, but you can run a head and cam pkg, stand alone without ANY other supporting mods? Im from cali so dont even mention long tubes! would a stand alone head and cam pkg pass smog?
08-03-2007, 01:03 AM
#23
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DE La Ware
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Tony,
Any probs with a 224/228 in a stock head car? Also in a 112 LSA? I looked on the AFR sight but do not see any info on cams. Any benefit from that cam over a straigh TR224?
Any probs with a 224/228 in a stock head car? Also in a 112 LSA? I looked on the AFR sight but do not see any info on cams. Any benefit from that cam over a straigh TR224?
08-03-2007, 03:23 PM
#25
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Patterson, CA
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there are many places that will over look visual, all they worry about is what passes on the sniffer test. i know the places ive been to have over looked visual and said all they care about is what comes out on the comuter, if it passes. thats it. find a shop that will over look visual, get some lt's and the tr224 cam on a 114lsa has been proven to pass cali sniffer. not sure about tony's cam but its not that much more aggressive than the tr224 so i dont see it having any issues passing. there have even been cases of tr224 on a 112 lsa w/o tune passing smog. but thats rare. just a matter of over looking visual and how good the tuner is i guess.
