Check my head flow and give my ur .02
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
please let me know what you think about my head flow number
1020 Superflow Bench 3.905 bore
Lift
2.02" Intake 1.57" Exhaust
.100
72 cfm 65 cfm
.200
140 cfm 124 cfm
.300
203 cfm 161 cfm
.400
245 cfm 197 cfm
.500
279 cfm 219 cfm
.550
291 cfm 226 cfm
.600
304 cfm 229 cfm
1020 Superflow Bench 3.905 bore
Lift
2.02" Intake 1.57" Exhaust
.100
72 cfm 65 cfm
.200
140 cfm 124 cfm
.300
203 cfm 161 cfm
.400
245 cfm 197 cfm
.500
279 cfm 219 cfm
.550
291 cfm 226 cfm
.600
304 cfm 229 cfm
#3
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Those are called "real world" numbers....LOL
(Dont be bummed out if you were expecting alot more...)
I'm guessing by the curve the exhaust is without a pipe.
Another key factor is how large the runner is. If its less than 220 cc's the numbers are pretty solid....less than 210cc's they are really solid.....over 230 cc's and there not that impressive....you get my point I'm sure.
Overall though the numbers look very realistic and regardless of runner volume should produce decent power. Also, 1020 benches (depending on how old it is) can read 5-10 CFM less than a 600 bench. If its a reasonably new bench the calibration between the two is very similar (Superflow addressed the discrepancy in their own machines a few years ago after stating for years prior there wasn't a discrepancy....neat "slide of hand"....LOL)
Have a runner cc'ed and you have all the info you really need at this point...
Good luck,
Tony
(Dont be bummed out if you were expecting alot more...)
I'm guessing by the curve the exhaust is without a pipe.
Another key factor is how large the runner is. If its less than 220 cc's the numbers are pretty solid....less than 210cc's they are really solid.....over 230 cc's and there not that impressive....you get my point I'm sure.
Overall though the numbers look very realistic and regardless of runner volume should produce decent power. Also, 1020 benches (depending on how old it is) can read 5-10 CFM less than a 600 bench. If its a reasonably new bench the calibration between the two is very similar (Superflow addressed the discrepancy in their own machines a few years ago after stating for years prior there wasn't a discrepancy....neat "slide of hand"....LOL)
Have a runner cc'ed and you have all the info you really need at this point...
Good luck,
Tony
#6
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 'tosa, wisconsin
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks almost identical to patriot's advertised flow for their stage 2 ls6 heads. http://www.patriot-performance.com/w...05234&DID=1225
#7
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
going to get rid of my A4 and do more of this.
![](http://a502sl0.pathogenproductions.com/damian1.jpg)
![](http://a502sl0.pathogenproductions.com/damian2.jpg)
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Why in the world did you send them out of state instead of one of the local benches we have a benchmark to compare against so those numbers mean something? If you have stock heads from that bench it might give you a clue. The numbers on paper look pretty decent, enough cyl head to make 450+ even on our dyno