Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2003, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Vettepartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III Heads

I am curious as to what people think the differences are between the "Stages" of head modifications. Like, where do larger valves fit in? I guess this is like buying a "Premium" tire. No real documented mods to distinguish between the stages. Any opinions?
Old 02-04-2003, 07:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fenris Ulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III Heads

Every porter has a different nomenclature. The stages really have no comparison value.
Old 02-05-2003, 07:51 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
HITMANSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III Heads

What Fenris said is mostly true --- the terminology differs from one supplier to the next. For example, CNC Performance Heads' Stage III's have stock-sized valves, and are specifically designed for use w/ the stock cam!

However, the general definition that I've seen from the major suppliers --- TEA, GTP, MTI, ARE, Absolute, etc. is as follows:

Stage 1 - stock valves, mild bowl work, ports just deburred or glass beaded.

Stage 1x - stock-sized swirl-polished valves, 4-angle valve job, glass beaded, ports opened up to 208-210 cc.

Stage 2 - over-sized valves (2.02" intakes) that will fit the original seats, extensive bowl & port work, 210-215 cc ports.

Stage 3 - 2.055" intakes on modified valve seats, extensive bowl & port work, 220+ cc ports.

All these heads can be milled for extra compression. Some suppliers go much bigger on port volume than others. The milder heads usually flow better at low lift #'s, not as high at .550"+, & have better velocity at low RPMs. The bigger heads flow better at high lift numbers, not as well at lower lifts.

These are generalities, and based on my personal observations only. The Director(s) of this UBB may (and often do) have differing opinions.
Old 02-05-2003, 05:34 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Vettepartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Stage I vs Stage II vs Stage III Heads

Thanks, Hitman, I appreciate your opinion.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.