Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

dont get it.. afr205's vs. tsp st2.5-5.3's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2008, 01:32 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
z28ss4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 653
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Umm...is it wrong to buy AFRs because they're the only heads with a CARB # on them and legal for smog in California?
Old 03-19-2008, 03:07 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
Teal94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCaL, Chino
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z28ss4me
Umm...is it wrong to buy AFRs because they're the only heads with a CARB # on them and legal for smog in California?
why would ported stock heads be illegal in cali?
Old 03-19-2008, 04:50 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Thick deck is not the only difference

>Dual quench pads (very good for high compression) and fuel burn eficiency,
>Much more PTVC allowing bigger cams to be run without flycutting.
>205cc runner (equal more trq),
>higher velocity (better feeding of chamber)
>Better swirl

So yes, you are not just paying for the name. AFR is still the best 15* aftermarket head.
Show me the last 475rwhp combo out of a stock casting and a 224/228 cam under .590 lifts. AFR delivers consistantly within the range of cams it was designed for

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 03-20-2008 at 06:52 AM. Reason: Sorry I was just working on SBC stuff
Old 03-20-2008, 06:30 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Thick deck is not the only difference

>Dual quench pads (very good for high compression) and fuel burn eficiency,
>Much more PTVC allowing bigger cams to be run without flycutting.
>205cc runner (equal more trq),
>higher velocity (better feeding of chamber)
>Better swirl

So yes, you are not just paying for the name. AFR is still the best 23* aftermarket head.
Show me the last 475rwhp combo out of a stock casting and a 224/228 cam under .590 lifts. AFR delivers consistantly within the range of cams it was designed for
No it's not.

It's a 15 * head.
Old 03-20-2008, 06:54 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Sorry, I was just working on some SBC stuff, late nite typing, thanks for the heads up
Old 03-20-2008, 07:38 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Sorry, I was just working on some SBC stuff, late nite typing, thanks for the heads up
Kinda figured it was just a typo or something..
Old 03-23-2008, 12:51 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
rob c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal:Inland Empire
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deuce_454
I dont get all this fuzz about AFR heads.. when you compare the advertised flow numbers for a set op TSP/PRC stage 2.5 5.3 heads

.300 208
.400 257
.500 290
.600 312

and a set of AFR 205.s

.200 140
.300 200
.400 261
.500 281
.550 292
.600 298

I just dont see the big difference.. are the AFR,s worth the extra 80% (plus springs) over the TSP/PRC heads?? i mean for that extra cash you could buy a fast 92/92 combo...

having Patrick G spec me a cam that propably ends up in the "torque cam" teritory... and the gar will see hard street and autocross time.. no drag strip..
AFR 205's flow 308 cfm at .600 intake and 233 cfm exhaust....not what you qouted.
Old 03-23-2008, 12:53 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
COD02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think AFR is great quality but i would never spend that much money on them. I'm a more bang for your buck guy.

If i hadn't gone with LS2's i would have spent the money on some nice 5.3L PRC's
Old 03-23-2008, 09:55 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
z28ss4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 653
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Teal94Z
why would ported stock heads be illegal in cali?
They wouldn't be, but who would port 853 on a 99 SS? the 5.3s aren't stock on my car so they'd technically be illegal...technically.
Old 03-23-2008, 10:25 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (71)
 
MrElectric03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I know the AFRs are a great quality and I also really like the TFS heads. however my car is a street car and not full track so I am choosing the PRC 5.3s and maybe adding a FAST later. I know the AFRs will get me more power but I dont need to pay $1000 for a couple tenths when my car will be plenty fast with the 5.3s and will save me money for the tune and 9" that I will need.

I will say this...later on when money allows I would like to build a track car and for that I will be looking to TFS or maybe AFR with the new 245cc(or 235cc I cant remember) that Tony Mamo is working on.
Old 03-23-2008, 10:45 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
 
landonew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL.
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MrElectric03
I know the AFRs are a great quality and I also really like the TFS heads. however my car is a street car and not full track so I am choosing the PRC 5.3s and maybe adding a FAST later. I know the AFRs will get me more power but I dont need to pay $1000 for a couple tenths when my car will be plenty fast with the 5.3s and will save me money for the tune and 9" that I will need.

I will say this...later on when money allows I would like to build a track car and for that I will be looking to TFS or maybe AFR with the new 245cc(or 235cc I cant remember) that Tony Mamo is working on.
Really, if you want a street car there is even more incentive to go with the AFRs. The low end torque is really good on the street, as opposed to the track where HP is more important do to the fact the the car spends most of its time at WOT at high RPMs. That is just my .02 though. Really can't go wrong with the PRC heads either (TSP does quality porting).
Old 03-25-2008, 07:07 AM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Aren't the cooling passages of the OEM head larger than the thicker deck AFR head...hence better cooling of OEM head. Whenever a head is beefed up or made thicker aren't the cooling passages made smaller. Lower volume water flow equals more heat, more heat equals detonation.
Old 03-25-2008, 07:17 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Thick deck is not the only difference

>Dual quench pads (very good for high compression) and fuel burn eficiency,
>Much more PTVC allowing bigger cams to be run without flycutting.
>205cc runner (equal more trq),
>higher velocity (better feeding of chamber)
>Better swirl
On the internet it is easy to bench race flow numbers alone and most people think that flow numbers alone makes the head but there is much more to it. Flow is good and everything but the real meat and potatos in the design of a head is in the combustion chamber design/valve placement. The chamber will have a huge affect on your burn as well as your piston to valve clearances. Any company can hog out a head to get big flow numbers to impress people on the internet.
Old 03-25-2008, 09:10 AM
  #34  
TECH Regular
 
1969mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bellaire, TX
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just buy what you can afford... or save up and get what you want...
has for me, cash is KING. I'm going with stock castings. I know i'll get the numbers i want and save cash.
Old 03-25-2008, 09:13 AM
  #35  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Brad, with all your "knowledge" and as a moderator we'd all expect a bit more research into your posts before making them. We have THE smallest volume runner of any CNC'd 5.3L casting available today.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 03-25-2008, 09:18 AM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Brad, with all your "knowledge" and as a moderator we'd all expect a bit more research into your posts before making them. We have THE smallest volume runner of any CNC'd 5.3L casting available today.
I wasnt comparing your heads with theirs, I was just trying to illustrate that its not all in flow numbers like some people think. It was a general statement. A lot of people are caught up in flow alone.

Sorry if I wasnt clear about that. I wasnt playing bias or trying to dog out any head porter.
Old 04-05-2008, 03:41 PM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
firefighter813x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Can I change it up by asking this....? PRC stage 2.5 5.3's VS TEA 1.5 5.3's...
Please comment-
Old 04-05-2008, 03:57 PM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2 words:

Port

Velocity



Imagine you open a window. The wind is blowing air in at 10mph. How much air is flowing through that window into your room in 3 seconds? Now close the window a little bit (say 10%), and now the wind is blowing at 15mph. Will more air flow through your window into your room now in 3 seconds?
Old 04-05-2008, 04:36 PM
  #39  
TECH Resident
 
eamador11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paint_It_Black
2 words:

Port

Velocity



Imagine you open a window. The wind is blowing air in at 10mph. How much air is flowing through that window into your room in 3 seconds? Now close the window a little bit (say 10%), and now the wind is blowing at 15mph. Will more air flow through your window into your room now in 3 seconds?
well said.... AFRs= max port velocity
Old 04-05-2008, 04:45 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
99zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
On the internet it is easy to bench race flow numbers alone and most people think that flow numbers alone makes the head but there is much more to it. Flow is good and everything but the real meat and potatos in the design of a head is in the combustion chamber design/valve placement. The chamber will have a huge affect on your burn as well as your piston to valve clearances. Any company can hog out a head to get big flow numbers to impress people on the internet.
alot of posts on here the tq is low with tsp heads, wich is important in a street car, it's not all about peak power under the curve is where its at.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.