ls1 strokers
#2
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
Re: ls1 strokers
MTI 382ci All-Bore, 221/221 T1 cam, 455 rwhp, 440 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
MTI 434ci, 244/244 S1 cam, 525 rwhp, 520 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
Both were FUN setups. The 382ci was much better for daily-driving, the 434ci was a bit too insane for daily driving, especially since I couldn't floor it until 3rd gear.
Tony
MTI 434ci, 244/244 S1 cam, 525 rwhp, 520 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
Both were FUN setups. The 382ci was much better for daily-driving, the 434ci was a bit too insane for daily driving, especially since I couldn't floor it until 3rd gear.
Tony
#3
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Re: ls1 strokers
I'm thinking of doing a 388 all bore within the next year (4.125 bore w/ stock crank)....
would my current TR 224/224 112LSA be too small for that engine? I noticed Nine Ball made 455rwhp with a 221 durration....
I have a 234/230 on a 112LSA that was too big (p-to-v) for my 346 (milled heads)...would that be better?
would my current TR 224/224 112LSA be too small for that engine? I noticed Nine Ball made 455rwhp with a 221 durration....
I have a 234/230 on a 112LSA that was too big (p-to-v) for my 346 (milled heads)...would that be better?
#5
Re: ls1 strokers
MTI 382ci All-Bore, 221/221 T1 cam, 455 rwhp, 440 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
MTI 434ci, 244/244 S1 cam, 525 rwhp, 520 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
Tony
MTI 434ci, 244/244 S1 cam, 525 rwhp, 520 ft-lbs SAE corrected Dynojet
Tony
Can you tell me where these two combos make peak HP/TQ?
Thanks!