Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

L92/LS3: What is needed to make 500RWHP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2012, 01:06 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedshifter
squee is right. heres a '10 camaro with ported ls3 heads, cam, and exhaust:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/gen-5-cam...m-package.html

gm high tech also did this article:

http://api.viglink.com/api/click?for...13280722553252

550 fwhp is 500rwhp
Your math is not correct 550 doesn't equal 500. That would be a 9.25% drivetrain loss. Thats a damn efficent drive train. Try 15-20% loss.
Old 02-01-2012, 02:23 PM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
topbrent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by squee
10.85 second LS3 cam only Vette making 498 at the tires.

LG dyno graph of a cam only Vette making 493 at the tires.

I can keep going, but I'd just be wasting my time. I don't really care if you believe me. Cam only Camaros are making 500rwhp. I even saw a LG cam only LS3 car make 530rwhp.
That link to the LG dyno chart shows that the car is using the LG G6X3 cam.

Do you know what cam the ECS car is running?
Old 02-02-2012, 08:31 AM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1lejohn
Your math is not correct 550 doesn't equal 500. That would be a 9.25% drivetrain loss. Thats a damn efficent drive train. Try 15-20% loss.
I was always told 10% for manual trans, 20% for auto. I guess I should have said +/-
Old 02-06-2012, 01:06 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
squee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Figure 10-12% for a manual tranny and a SRA. IRS would be a little more. 15-18% for a stalled auto with a SRA, and closer to 20% with a IRS. Again, this is all on average. My car for instance eats up a little more than some 4th gen manuals since I have a Moser 12 bolt and it sucks up some power compared to other rear ends.

But yeah, my tune says I'll make 490-500 at the wheels with my setup and the cam he spec'd me, I'd bet it makes 10-15 more than that. He doesn't like giving guesses at all and he's very conservative if he does. 500RWHP isn't hard at all to make with a cam/bolt-ons LS3. I've even seen one make over 530 at the wheels.
Old 02-06-2012, 02:45 PM
  #25  
Launching!
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am also in agreement that a cam only LS3 has made very close or over the 500 mark... many times (just depends on the small details).

I am looking to go LS3 in my Camaro later this year, hopefully.
Old 02-09-2012, 12:29 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
FYDEL1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quick question guys. Newbie here. 2010 LS3 Camaro, manual 6 spd. 426 hp. Rear wheel or flywheel?
Old 02-09-2012, 03:31 PM
  #27  
On The Tree
 
DirtyDirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jackson, MO
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Flywheel
Old 02-10-2012, 03:17 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
squee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Factory is always rated at the flywheel.
Old 02-10-2012, 11:22 AM
  #29  
Teching In
 
FYDEL1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My next question is how do you guys go from 426 fwhp to 500+ rwhp with very little modification, at least in my own opinion. I am amazed at the results I have seen on this forum and ,of course, I am very impressed so no disrespect intended here.
Old 04-11-2012, 09:18 AM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Starting to piece together everything to build this sucker. I got an L92 motor (10.4:1) and I found a good deal on a set of new OEM LS3 pistons (10.9:1). I picked up the pistons but I need rings for them. With GM's track record of oil consumption, I'm skeptical about running OEM rings. This motor will not have a power adder on it, just 500 RWHP naturally aspirated.

Google searching only came up with a set of 4.065" moly rings by Hastings. Should I go with these or are there others out there?

I've read good things about Total Seal rings, but they specify for use with aftermarket pistons only.
Old 04-11-2012, 09:13 PM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

"Starting to piece together everything to build this sucker."

Are you going with 1 7/8" long tube headers? I wonder if Geoff can just flash the ECM with a new program as it seems a lot of these builds are almost identical. At least it would get one in the ball park until you could get a dyno tune. I plan on doing just about the same build but keep the VVT.
Old 04-11-2012, 11:24 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah gonna go with the Dynatech headers, 1-7/8" primaries, 3" collector. Then running a full 3" exhaust. I'm gonna run a GM LS controller. I'm not worried about a base tune, I'll just use the one that comes loaded in the kit. I'll get it dyno tuned after its running.
Old 04-12-2012, 08:33 PM
  #33  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

"I'm not worried about a base tune, I'll just use the one that comes loaded in the kit"

So does upgraded software come with the cam and valve spring kit?
Old 04-13-2012, 08:28 AM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is that sarcasm I sense?

I'm confident that with the mods I'm doing to the engine, the tune that comes in the LS controller kit will be just fine for first time fire up and taking the car around the block to get the bugs worked out. I'll take it for a dyno tune promptly after its all buttoned up.

Last edited by speedshifter; 04-13-2012 at 08:52 AM.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:05 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

No, I was thinking of the VVT L92/LS3 motor that Texas Speed I thought included tables with. That is where I was coming from.
Old 05-13-2012, 04:13 AM
  #36  
Teching In
 
fc3slsxpwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I can chime in. I am currently running a 429CI LS3 stroker.

The engine block is a new LS3 block. It was final honed to a bore of 4.070
The block had to be decked because it was way to rough of a surface out of the box.
We only took about 0.002 off the deck. Pistons stick out about 0.008 from the deck.
The connecting rods are scat rods with arp 2000 bolts.
The crank is a Eagle LS7 4.125 stroke crank.
The timing chain is a C5R chain from Katech.
The oil pump is a shimmed and ported ls7 pump.
The DOD ports were tapped an plugged using 1/8 npt plugs.
The diamond pistons were custom made by diamond. The pistons have a 3 cc hump on them so I could raise the compression with out running custom head gaskets or having to cut the heads. The rings were filed to 0.024 gap for street nitrous (150 shot).
I am running the SDPC CNC ported LS3 heads.
The heads were disassembled and checked for Valve to guide clearance as well as going over spring pressures. The were also cced at 68 cc. The springs, retainers, and locks are very high quality. The closed seat pressure for the springs were 160 lbs and the open at .660 lift were 450 lbs.

The cam shaft I ended going with is a comp cams 54-474-11. The gross lift is .660 (based on 1.8 yella terra rockers i am running) on intake and exhaust.

The duration is
@ 0.006 300 in 316 ex
@ 0.050 251 in 267 ex

The static compression is at 12.79:1
The DCR is 8.4:1

The head gaskets I went with are the LS9 OEM head gasket. They are .051 thick when installed. They are a 7 layer MLS and have a 4.090.

Not sure what else I missed. The engine made 660hp@6900rpm and 567trq@5900rpm on our engine dyno. On our mustang dyno it made 505whp (560 whp dynojet) last season. This season I ported the fast 102mm intake and rebuilt my cold air intake. I hope to see 525whp N/A on 94 pump gas. PM me if you have any other questions.

Cheers,
Ryan
Old 05-13-2012, 05:04 AM
  #37  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At last a bit of common sense real world performance.

I've run as fast as 121mph in a 3880lb Monaro (GTO), that works out at about 535 horse power and I have not dynoed anywhere near 450rwhp!

This is with a crate LS3 with 1 7/8" extractors and a Comp 231 239 113 .617 .624 cam.
Old 05-13-2012, 10:51 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FYDEL1
My next question is how do you guys go from 426 fwhp to 500+ rwhp with very little modification, at least in my own opinion. I am amazed at the results I have seen on this forum and ,of course, I am very impressed so no disrespect intended here.
They put a f---kg blower on them. LOL
Old 05-13-2012, 02:54 PM
  #39  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

No blowers bud, I don't think LG would want to BS IMHO, I know that some of these members are not the brightest BUT this link is by LG

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=219131

Another with track times to back it up lol
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=187554
Old 05-13-2012, 02:58 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
82cetuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Here is my two cents.

Spend the money and have your injectors sent to Fuel injector outlet for 200 bucks and get them rebuild to whatever PSI you want, myself and one other maxed out over 100 percent on injectors making a little over 500rwhp on dynos, your right at the max point depending on fuel setup its extra insurence and they wont have to work as hard.

as far as 500rwhp since you are staying with stock cubes its really going to come down to came selection and the dyno you use, my 418 ls3 with ported and milled ls3 heads and a g6x3 cam made 508 on a dynojet with a ford 9 inch under it threw a manuel. there are stock cube ls3s breaking over 500rwhp but it was done with a very well planned out top end, my biggest limiter right now is running a 85mm maf and the stock ported ls3 intake. I think your setup will get you very close have patrick G custom spec you a cam. its really all in the build 500RWHP has been done in LS1s pat gs makes just has much rwhp as my 418 does but mine is a very mild build and has alot of room to grow


Quick Reply: L92/LS3: What is needed to make 500RWHP?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.