Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

lightened internals= better mpg?

Old Feb 3, 2012 | 03:18 PM
  #1  
bp944's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 245
Likes: 1
Default lightened internals= better mpg?

I was looking at the components to do a engine buildup and I realized that if you do it right you can take a lot of weight out of the engine. This is all rough math but a callies crank can be 5-15lbs lighter, a set of rods can be 1-2 pounds, pistons can be 1 pound. Along with a 5-10 pound lighter flywheel. Its almost conceivable to pull off 20 lbs on the moving internals. How much does that result in mpgs? I'd be doing this for power but if you had a stock internals and forged but were the same specs what would be the difference in mpg?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 07:40 PM
  #2  
S10xGN's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 7
From: Port Neches, TX
Default

I wouldn't think it would help anything at a "steady state" cruise, a lighter rotating mass mainly aids in acceleration...
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #3  
redtan's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 17
From: Belmont, MA
Default

I wouldn't think it would help anything at a "steady state" cruise, a lighter rotating mass mainly aids in acceleration...
Why not? Any increase in efficiency and power will result in less throttle needed to keep the car going at a steady rate, thus increasing MPGs.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 08:25 PM
  #4  
wadd's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

might give better mileage around town due to lower rotating inertial but the effects will likely be very small. No difference in steady state driving since loses are due to friction (bearings, rings/bore). It's possible there might be a slight reduction in piston side loading, but again, likely wouldn't show up in improved mileage.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 10:17 PM
  #5  
3rdCoastPowerSports's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 6
From: Loony Bin
Default

i wouldn't think you would really see any better MPG
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2012 | 04:44 AM
  #6  
LS1MCSS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 8
From: Dover, Arkansas
Default

One thing you most likely will see is less durability.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2012 | 05:23 AM
  #7  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

I have taken about 42lb off my rotating mass, no diff in mpg.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2012 | 06:17 AM
  #8  
davidws6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 747
Likes: 5
From: Kansas
Default

I think it would help, but the results would probably be minimal.

One thing that helps for mileage is optimizing your timing tables.
I've seen many timing tables below 40 > 50 kpa flat to WOT. Yet there can be a few degrees added in the cruise regions without any detonation. Then after optimizing your timing table, you'll probably have to take out a little fuel as the fuel trims go positive cause the engine is more efficient.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2012 | 03:17 PM
  #9  
john kilgore's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 439
Likes: 1
From: burbank ca
Default

learn to drive with a vaccuum guage
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2012 | 09:37 PM
  #10  
S10xGN's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 7
From: Port Neches, TX
Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Why not? Any increase in efficiency and power will result in less throttle needed to keep the car going at a steady rate, thus increasing MPGs.
Just to clear it up, a steady state cruise requires a certain amount of HP (disregarding incidentals like wind, elevation changes, etc) to maintain a given speed. Messing with the rotating assembly will have zero effect on that required HP number. Hence, no change in the engine's HP output.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.