Shorter Runners for FAST Intake!!!




I predict peak HP @ 5800-6000 RPM. It will be a beast!
What car is this going in?
What is the displacement, heads and cam specs on
you're engine below that LSXRT?
1989GTA,
I posted results with the mid length runners in both this
section (0 replies lol) and the Dyno results section with
few replies/comments.
I can surmise from my results that to take advantage
of the mid length runners a combination should
reach peak HP @ 7000 RPM Minimum up to 7500,
and shifting @ 7500 RPM Minimum up to 8000+
So I would consider LLSR & Top Tier Heads at a
minimum. Have some thoughts on a killer 416"
street/strip combo I will post in the other threads
if there is any interest.
Right now my motor is peaking at 6600rpm and holds on to close to 7000rpm. I really do not want to spin the motor any further than that. I am currently at 512rwhp on a Mustang dyno and a 6L80 transmission.
I have the LLSR with 244/252 with .650" lift on both intake and exhaust. I seem to be in the middle power wise with some higher and a few lower than me.




What heads,compression, Header size, exhaust, and LSA &
Advance do you have,
My cam is LLSR 243*/249* (add 2* for larger diameter lifters)
and I Peak 7100-7300 RPM with a 3.600" Stroke.
Is your engine 4.06"X4.10" stroke or 4.125X4.00" stroke.
Got it! (LMMFAO!)
KW
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Again Nice post!
Again Nice post!
Headers are stepped 1 3/4" by 1 7/8". Exhaust is dual 3" with an X-pipe. Straight through 3" mufflers. Camshaft is on a 115lsa with 4 degrees advanced.
I just think that losing torque at all RPMs and losing HP all way up to and beyond 6K RPMs is a bad trade-off in order to gain HP above 7K RPMs......particularly in a car that's gonna see regular street duty.
But hey.....I'm just silly like that.
KW
Perhaps for some the high RPMs is not worth the trade in lower-RPM power. My interest was in the ability to make any power at all at 7500. Longer runners just fall on their face it seems.





