Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS3 -PD XS Intake **New**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2024, 11:30 AM
  #41  
DJZ
Teching In
 
DJZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Build is coming out nice !!

also had to cut/trim my driver side coil relocation bracket so I could clear the fuel rail adapter.

the bolts that came with the bracket were also causing the intake not to seat properly so had to remove the bottom 4 and just keep the top 4. (Proform Valve Cover w/ brackets)

Old 03-27-2024, 03:30 PM
  #42  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1786 Vlogs SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 30
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Is this on Corvette or Camaro. I'm testing the fuel rail one more time, then will place the lid on. I know the lid will have to flex inward as my heads are 64cc chamber. The intake realy flexed when I bolted it down.

Last edited by 1786 Vlogs SS; 03-29-2024 at 06:25 PM.
Old 03-28-2024, 04:59 PM
  #43  
DJZ
Teching In
 
DJZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

@1786 Vlogs SS install was on a c6 vette.

haven’t seen many with this intake either
Old 03-29-2024, 05:12 PM
  #44  
TECH Regular
 
fnbadaz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 467
Received 194 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1786 Vlogs SS
Is this on Corvette or Camaro. I'm testing the fuel rail one more time, then will place the lod on. I know the lid will have to flex inward as my heads are 64cc chamber. The intake realy flexed when I bolted it down.
I'm willing to bet that L.O.D intake will give up a ton of power below 6000, then really shine from there up .
Old 03-29-2024, 06:28 PM
  #45  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1786 Vlogs SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 30
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

It was a error, I ment to say lid. The LOD intake isn't sustainable I belive for NA power. Runners are to short unless you only plan to sit above 6500 rom alot, then maybe.
The following users liked this post:
fnbadaz06 (04-01-2024)
Old 04-22-2024, 11:48 PM
  #46  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1786 Vlogs SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 30
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Dyno is on May the 10, hopefully will see some gains. Here is everything finished up. I think it looks better than the Fast 102. So that's a win.

Old 04-24-2024, 10:10 AM
  #47  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,572
Received 484 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

I like how the carbon fiber inlay on the intake matches your CAI tube. Really nice looking!
Old 04-24-2024, 10:27 AM
  #48  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1786 Vlogs SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 30
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1Formulation
I like how the carbon fiber inlay on the intake matches your CAI tube. Really nice looking!
Thanks! Its hard to build that intake tube as you have to epoxy the MAF bung and PVC bung which i modified from a MAF bung to accept 6AN line, to the carbon tube, took lots of planning and measuring and cutting. I purchased it from Anvil. Took it for s spin last night and from 3500rpm up my fuel ratio use to be 12.9/12.8 and now is 13.8/13.9 up to 6500rpm. This is even when I add 1% more fuel just to see what it would do. So the intake is working, i'm lean so i'm getting more air. I'm going to add 3% more fuel and see what happens. Dyno is May 10, on a mustang dyno so yes numbers are lower than normal, but i'm at 3000 feet above sea level. Also My last Dyno was with a Fast 102, so this will be one of the first true test to compare. I'll post results.
Old 04-26-2024, 12:58 PM
  #49  
Teching In
 
NOTORIOUS VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It looks different because whoever was running the dyno did the new run (red line) in a different gear (compared to the green/blue runs). So your comparison is completely useless here.

This happens when people don't know how to operate their dyno correctly. Also there should be no good reason to have the X-axis in wheel/drum speed instead of RPM (unless of course again the dyno operator has no idea how to use the dyno).

Originally Posted by DJZ
I recently installed one on my A6 LS3 H/C Vette, results were a tad unexpected.
It made more top end but my low power band seems odd
Dyno graph

Old 05-12-2024, 07:12 PM
  #50  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
1786 Vlogs SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 30
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Results are in and there not any better than my stock ls3 intake. I gain 10hp at 5500 to 7000. Ok, it does look better, however there has to be some paramters to produce a gains with this intake in my opinion. My heads 235 cam combo netted no real change only 10hp, it did gain but I expected more. Does feel better up top. Mid feel the same even though the numbers are a tad lower. Here is the dyno. LS3 vs XS. Life moves on and so will I.





Quick Reply: LS3 -PD XS Intake **New**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.