Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ultimate LS7 intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2007, 10:09 AM
  #21  
On The Tree
 
silicone boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reminder to self: you don't have anymore money
Old 01-18-2007, 10:14 AM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
corvettetimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been wondering if there is any negative effect to the runners blocking 50% of the TB opening. I know that the factory ls7 intake has the same characteristic as well.
Old 01-18-2007, 11:35 AM
  #23  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I'd be curious to see a test of the ls1 manafold, and a fast, to see what the 2 compare out like. I dunno if dropping 3 G's on an intake would be worth it.. it would have to make at least 30 more Hp then the fast for a good part of the RPM range on a 400+ ci motor for me to even consider it honestly.. but still be an intresting test.


The ls7 type, vs the actual ls7 intake should be intresting as well.
Old 01-18-2007, 11:40 AM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JL ws-6
I'd be curious to see a test of the ls1 manafold, and a fast, to see what the 2 compare out like. I dunno if dropping 3 G's on an intake would be worth it.. it would have to make at least 30 more Hp then the fast for a good part of the RPM range on a 400+ ci motor for me to even consider it honestly.. but still be an intresting test.


The ls7 type, vs the actual ls7 intake should be intresting as well.
Personally I would think that more gains would be seen on the ls1 version than on the LS7. NOt to bash ls7 version at all, just the factory piece is so good.

BTW if I had the money, I would buy this just for the bling factor
Old 01-18-2007, 11:56 AM
  #25  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

oh the bling factor is sweet... but I really would have to see a big power gain over the fast 90 to make it worth while. I knwo that 850 is a good chunk of $ for the fast, but 3K for the wilson, is alot harder to swallow unless there's a damn good power gain.
Old 01-18-2007, 12:01 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Oh yeah, I agree with you 100%. I think on your heads, 30 rwhp may not be out of the question.
I think it would really shine on a set of 265's though.
Old 01-18-2007, 12:07 PM
  #27  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Possible.. I know the et 240's I am running will easily outflow the fast. I cleaned teh fast up a little before it went on the motor, but it's not really ported by any means.

I have pic's of a mamo-ported intake, so I have a good referance should I ever decide to do anything with it.. but to be honest I really question if it will do much more hten what I already did.

To be honest another 30 hp on motor would be nice, for the racing I plan to do this year it would probably get the car right where it needs to be if not past it (10.5 index) but I think there's alot more to be gained by adding a set of 28 inch et drags then an intake swap will get me at this point, that and possible a real drag rear swaybar, and some more weight reduction, preferrably of the free kind.

Blowing 3 grand on an intake, I'm not doing this year. I come up with an extra 3 grand and I'm buying a trailer.
Old 01-18-2007, 02:11 PM
  #28  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,060
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

According to Mike at Wilson, this intake only stands about 1/2" taller than a factory LS7 intake. Looks like we will be ordering one for one of the car builds we are currently doing. It is also supposed to match up at all mounting points just as the LS7 intake does.
Old 01-18-2007, 02:13 PM
  #29  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

that's good to hear, a direct bolt in unit.
Old 01-18-2007, 02:48 PM
  #30  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
Nasty N8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow this thread took off ya it is a direct bolton style. I have seen them mounted in an F-body and they look trick. On a big cube motor it should be worth quite a bit over a FAST as Wilson desinged the FAST and they made this as an improvement. We will have dyno #ers on this one shortly. Here is a teaser at F-R-E

Nate
Attached Thumbnails Ultimate LS7 intake-show-engines2.jpg   Ultimate LS7 intake-wilson-manifolds2.jpg  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:01 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nasty N8
Wow this thread took off ya it is a direct bolton style. I have seen them mounted in an F-body and they look trick. On a big cube motor it should be worth quite a bit over a FAST as Wilson desinged the FAST and they made this as an improvement. We will have dyno #ers on this one shortly. Here is a teaser at F-R-E

Nate
Damn man, did he get a bulk deal on those MSD coils packs or what!!!!
Old 01-18-2007, 03:46 PM
  #32  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I could put that one with the DP on it to good use... want a test car to try one of those out on? 13 to 1 402, big cam, etc.etc, I'm sure if the intake is gonna make a differnence, I have a car that would show it.
Old 01-18-2007, 03:54 PM
  #33  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,060
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Nate, I forgot to ask Wilson....are the fuel rails extra? Or do they come with the intake?
Old 01-18-2007, 05:53 PM
  #34  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
ramairws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hicksville MN!
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Very interested in seeing dyno numbers from Katech on the LS7 version! Should help alot of us decide on different routes to go with.Traver
Old 01-19-2007, 01:57 AM
  #35  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

man they look good! W2W be nice to try the Harrop intake in that test to!

thanks Chris.
Old 01-19-2007, 02:43 AM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
pist0lpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Am I the only one that sees that at $3 it is approaching the price territory of an ITB setup? No way it is gonna outflow ITB's not to mention the gains to be had with idle quality with big cams with an ITB manifold. No doubt it is an extremely nice piece however and would be a hot ticket especially with forced induction.
Old 01-20-2007, 03:15 AM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
ls1408cp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont think the Harrop is as great as people make it to be.
Old 01-20-2007, 10:11 PM
  #38  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1408cp
I dont think the Harrop is as great as people make it to be.
Even if it didn't make anymore power than this intake, which is doubtful, the idle, driveability, and ability to run a massive camshaft without fear make up for it. However, your entitled to your opinion. The Wilson is still a bad *** lookin gintake though. I will give it that.
Old 01-21-2007, 02:08 AM
  #39  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Reckless
Nate....I called Wilson today for dimensions. I have to call back on Thursday for measurements. I will post here after I get them.
What dimensions do you want to know? Runner length is 8" for the LS7, little shorter at 6 for the LS1 style. We have 8" to play with from valley cover to base of the cowl. Port on the LS1 style is suited to fit the AFR225 head, 1.145 inches wide is the number I came up with I believe.

We checked out the LS1 at PRI last year, and the new LS7 at the show this year. I know of a Top Stock racer that runs one on a 347

Reckless the rails are extra. Im sure you guys get good pricing at W2W, at our pricing tier they werent all that expensive, crazy purple color that all of Wilsons stuff is, not sure f its cool looking yet or not or purple just kills all the cool factor of the color
Old 01-21-2007, 02:11 AM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JL ws-6
I could put that one with the DP on it to good use... want a test car to try one of those out on? 13 to 1 402, big cam, etc.etc, I'm sure if the intake is gonna make a differnence, I have a car that would show it.



Those intakes have been out for 2 years now, its Wilson Manifolds if they give one to anyone it would be a NHRA racer Terry and them are good guys to deal with but dont know how much they give away anymore


Quick Reply: Ultimate LS7 intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.