Gordon0652

iTrader: (4)

Now all we are wating for is a price.
Very nice welds!

Stang's Bane

iTrader: (22)

If one had the valvetrain to support additional rpms, it would only help the hp on the topend.


You would lose a little on the ottom end though..

4SFEDZ

iTrader: (6)

Nice!!!

JL ws-6

iTrader: (50)

I'd cut the cowl right of to put that on, no questioning that.

I hope they come up with one that will bolt to the cathedral heads

texinteg

iTrader: (4)

I thought he said they had one for the LS1 which would be the cathedral heads.

forrestd

indeed there is a ls1 version in the works

forrestd

N/A RESULTS:

We tested this manifold on a 438ci Gen 4 n/a motor with mild cam, and suffice to say the expected gains just didn't happen (over the regular L76 manifold). Sorry guys but it was worth a try.. there may be some further tweaking of the runners yet, not sure..

However Russo Performance will soon be trying this intake on an LSx BOOSTED application; we'll let you know how that one goes!

Sharpe

iTrader: (7)

Maybe it has something to do with the transition between the TB and the plentum. You know, what Van Ruthdude was talking about.

SUTTERERMAN85

iTrader: (42)

Its sure is nice even without the gains . Prob right at home on a boosted application too. Some seriously good quality there too i must say, wish i had those mad skills.

speedracer5532

iTrader: (8)

Was this intake ever tested on a LSx BOOSTED application?

Lythropus

iTrader: (13)

[QUOTE=Beaflag VonRathburg;7790868]Maybe I was a little vague?



VS.



Who makes this intake, that's real craftsmanship...

NHRAMAN

iTrader: (1)

That looks almost too nice to stick under a hood.......

Beaflag VonRathburg

iTrader: (176)

[QUOTE=Lythropus;8527695]I'm I remember correctly it's from Beck.