LS3/l92 valves titanium available?
stock = 106grams
hollow = 91grams
ti = ?
The only source I've found would be custom valves from Ferrea and thats $1000+ for just the intake valves alone.
Anyone know of a cheaper alternative?
Light valves, light wt springs and retainers reduces the likely hood of valve float.
with these light wt valves, IIRC you want to keep valves lift under .600 too
SS valves are still to heavy for high rpm use. but many ppl use SS valves to keep costs down.
Ti or Sodium filled valves are for NA applications, not FI or N2
Or something like that
I have them in my 243 heads
They are about $100 each for the valves.
I would think that there are some valves that are close to the size of the LS3/L92 that could be cut down to save a little money.
We use Ti on Intake and Exhaust. We spin this close to 9000 RPM
Robin
I am not fond of the manufactuer. They were kind of arrogant when I talked to them at SEMA.

I just ordered another set of valves. They are for the GMPP Large Port LSX heads that I have. 2.250 and 1.600
Give Dale a call, he can help you out.
Robin
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Would it now have been cheaper to get a set of the OEM Del-West valves from the dealer?
Can you post the weight of the valves?
First, manufacturing titanium valves for the LS1,2 & L92 heads poses a real difficulty. The base design of the these valves leaves a very short tip length. As a result it's not possible to insert a hardened tip and there is not an adequate amount of room to install a lash cap. If you grow the valve tip length to .290" long then a hardened steel tip insert can be used. This doesn't solve all the problems however, because growing the tip length posses rocker geometry issues. The answer to correcting the rocker geometry is to machine and install a shaft rocker system whos assembled height can be adjusted to correct the geometry.
Titanium valves should recieve some type of coating to increase their wear life. Chromium nitrite, DLC or PVD coatings cost $. PVD coating for example costs approx $300.00 per set. On top of the $800.00 that makes for an expensive set of valves.
In short, stick with your stainless valves unless you're real serious about buzzing your engine.
Good luck,
Richard
Stock L92 intake-108.6 grams -- Some non magnetic alloy
Manley 11620 -119 grams- Intake- The Manleys are solid SS
Manley 11621-92 grams- Exh
LS3 intake -89 grams -- hollow alloy and my current favorite (NA) with single springs
LS3 exh same part# as L92 Exh- some non magnetic alloy

PEP Ti Coated 2.16 = 67.2 grams
Last edited by 76TALS1; Dec 1, 2008 at 01:26 PM. Reason: adding valve weight
LS7 Exhaust Valve- 71.7 g
Retainer- 11.1g
keepers pair- 2.6 g
Stock L92 intake-108.6 grams -- Some non magnetic alloy
Manley 11620 -119 grams- Intake- The Manleys are solid SS
Manley 11621-92 grams- Exh
LS3 intake -89 grams – hollow stem alloy
LS3 exh same part# as L92 Exh- alloy
It was cheaper to buy the Manley. I got them from TSP. I did not weigh them before I had them assembled. I wish now [I] would have had them coated. Did not know about that at the time.
Stainless valves 125g +-5g
Stock L92 valve 115g +-5g
LS9 ti. zr1 valve 75g +-5g
the ls9 valves are the same exact height as the stock ones, but the grove the keepers sit in are a few mm's lower than the stock and stainless valves.

