Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Budget 427

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2009, 12:13 PM
  #41  
FormerVendor
 
Quick Carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The Morris/ERL set-up uses a long sleeve and 4" stroke with the larger 4.125" bore like the LS7 vs a smaller bore on the L92/LS3 with a short sleeve and longer stroke to get the 427. This keeps the piston from pulling out of the cylinder where the issues with rock and ring seal occur. GM went through the trouble to make a longer sleeve to run a 4" stroke in the LS7 even with a cast piston where the piston clearance is tighter than the forged set-ups your going to. If moving the break point higher is the fix, then GM would have done that much easier than the long sleeve. It may have to do with as you get closer to the piston top the more heat and growth your going to see at the break point making piston to wall clearance less controlable. Change the tune and the clearance varies that much more.
The LS3, L92 or LS7 has a thinner wall cast iron sleeve vs. a stronger Ductile iron sleeve in the Morris set-up, so you can see it's not an even comparison with a stock block build.
Old 09-30-2009, 08:16 PM
  #42  
TECH Apprentice
 
ss dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm happy with my LME wet sump LS7.
Bowler 4l60e with Hurst dual gate and Compushift controller.
On a conservative Mustang Dyno it put down 525rwhp.
The swap is not as simple as you may have been lead to believe. Good info at Pro-touring.com, Lateral-G.net
A LS harness will not work without MAJOR mods, you would be better off with Speartech.




I choose the LS7 since the 69 did come with an COPO 427 and it could have been the Ultra rare ZL-1.
I wanted to build a car with some true hertiage.
With the LS7 and ATS spindles, DA Varishocks, custom 600# springs, SKF C6 racing hubs, Glink rear, DSE box and Mark Williams Aluminum drivestick it handles on rails. The beauty of the small block.

Last edited by ss dave; 09-30-2009 at 08:57 PM.
Old 10-01-2009, 04:24 PM
  #43  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by ss dave
I'm happy with my LME wet sump LS7.
Bowler 4l60e with Hurst dual gate and Compushift controller.
On a conservative Mustang Dyno it put down 525rwhp.
The swap is not as simple as you may have been lead to believe. Good info at Pro-touring.com, Lateral-G.net
A LS harness will not work without MAJOR mods, you would be better off with Speartech.

I choose the LS7 since the 69 did come with an COPO 427 and it could have been the Ultra rare ZL-1.
I wanted to build a car with some true hertiage.
With the LS7 and ATS spindles, DA Varishocks, custom 600# springs, SKF C6 racing hubs, Glink rear, DSE box and Mark Williams Aluminum drivestick it handles on rails. The beauty of the small block.

Love your car! You did it right and the details are top notch!
Old 10-01-2009, 04:34 PM
  #44  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Anniversary "Z"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
Love your car! You did it right and the details are top notch!
X2
Old 10-01-2009, 05:00 PM
  #45  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

All PM's have been returned with quotes. Frito shoot me a pm & I'd be happy to get you a good quote. We use all new parts including the block, we also use Callies parts & Wiseco pistons. We can build a Mahle/Eagle short-block if someone had to have it, but who really wants to be that guy when you can run the Callies/Wiseco combo for less money??
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 10-03-2009, 12:56 AM
  #46  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
ramairws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hicksville MN!
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...e-engines.html
Old 10-08-2009, 07:11 PM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss dave
I'm happy with my LME wet sump LS7.
Bowler 4l60e with Hurst dual gate and Compushift controller.
On a conservative Mustang Dyno it put down 525rwhp.
The swap is not as simple as you may have been lead to believe. Good info at Pro-touring.com, Lateral-G.net
A LS harness will not work without MAJOR mods, you would be better off with Speartech.




I choose the LS7 since the 69 did come with an COPO 427 and it could have been the Ultra rare ZL-1.
I wanted to build a car with some true hertiage.
With the LS7 and ATS spindles, DA Varishocks, custom 600# springs, SKF C6 racing hubs, Glink rear, DSE box and Mark Williams Aluminum drivestick it handles on rails. The beauty of the small block.
I wish my 69 looked as good as your - very nice ride. I am guessing your car did not come with an original 427, either L72 or ZL1. Both COPO9560 and COPO9561 were coupes, not convertibles. (as was Z28) Only 69 COPO9560 cars were made and the few real ones left are worth a fortune.
Old 10-08-2009, 07:27 PM
  #48  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
davidws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default 427

I'd do the better of the two which is the Morris sleeved or ls7 block. May cost a few more $ but I'll stop there.

BTW, SSDave, Tooooooo Nice !!!!
Old 10-08-2009, 07:28 PM
  #49  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whatever u put in it..it's a great lookin' 69.
Old 10-22-2009, 04:48 PM
  #50  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
ramairws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hicksville MN!
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts

Default Here's another one for ya!!

"sorry you had a bad experience" quoted by schwanke engines

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey everyone. I am the one Ramairws6 has been telling you about. Now you can hear what happened directly from me, Chuck. What Mark from Schwanke Engines said is true, I WAS a long time customer. Here is how the story goes from start to finish...I have had 3 engines built by them, and none of them have lasted. The first one was a stock motor, which is understandable why it did not last. Engine #2 I put the good stuff in. After a year of street driving I decided to put bigger heads on it right before winter. We dynoed it at 287 to RWH. The next summer it started to smoke real bad out of the exhaust and drinking oil so I decided to pull the engine thinking there was a busted ring. I was told that the seals on the heads went out. For being only about a year old and 1000 miles on them, I was shocked. We all put trust in our engine builders so I believed him (Schwanke Engines). Engine #3...$8000 later, 525 HP to the crank, back on the road again, and you have to understand that I do not go to the track and race it, it is a street car engine. I question why it took 3 times to get this kind of HP! So half way through my second 55 gallon drum of E98 fuel, my oil pressure started to jump around so I did the easy things like change the oil pressure gauge and stuff like that and nothing helped. Then I knew that it was something internal, so I took it out and back up to Schwanke Engines we went AGAIN where they found out that it walked out a cam bearing. Then I was asked if I changed anything, I said yes. I put on electronic water pump and fan system. They told me that that caused the bearing to walk because the wider gap between an electric water pump and timing chain cover versus stock is wider. Then I decided to fix it. Schwanke Engines charged me $1000 to fix it. They then listed it and sold the short block for $3600 (I sold the top end for $2600. Then I was told if I do not spend the $3600 there (Schwanke Engines) they would charge me $500 for selling it. Now do the math...THAT IS GOOD GAS MILEAGE!! Now, at this point I am sick and tired of 40-year-old technology. Then I decided to build a 440 stroker LS7 motor. I sat down with Schwanke Engines (Tim) and told him what I wanted, a 12:1 compression stroker 440 with LS7 heads. He tried to convince me to run L92 heads instead of LS7 because of the price. It seemed like during this whole engine build he did not care about what I wanted, rather what he wanted, for example, -8 in the hole pistons (must have gotta good deal on 'em). I started out just doing the short block because of money issues. Everyone knows that LS7 get expensive. One year went by and I asked Tim from Schwanke Engines what it would cost to finish it and it blew my mind. I started to check around for prices on what things cost and noticed that they were almost double than what I could buy them for so I took the short block home and started to purchase things slowly. Like Ramairws6 said, I did not realize they were a drysump engine with no dipstick...and this was not explained to me by Tim. Then I took the short block to Rippie to have a dip stick tube hole machined in and check everything over. Rippie noticed the engine was dirty right away (and that came from Schwanke Engines taking it to their shows and not taking the right precautions for keeping it clean). Rippie tore down the short block and found issues (ring gap too wide, piston ring needed a pliers to pull it out of the piston ring, rods were ground on FOR WHAT REASON I DON'T KNOW, the rear main seal cover was not for a corvette, balancing was good enough for a stock motor but not for a race engine, rod and main bearing clearances were on the loose end of the spec {I guess that is why I never had oil pressure}, when the block was clearanced for the rods they (Schwanke Engines) ground a lot more than what was needed for clearancing. Basically they had an idea where the rod would hit the block and started to grind away, and it had the low end ARP rod bolts. It is not a true 440 either, it is only a 438 stroker.) There is probably more, I just cannot remember everything. I guess I just had a "BAD EXPERIENCE," quoted directly from Mark from Schwanke Engines.
Old 10-23-2009, 09:57 AM
  #51  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (12)
 
GMLSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Katech Inc. has kick *** budget 427 shortblocks for sale. It is what i have and im very happy! They are a very high quality engine shop, they are worth every penny!
Old 10-28-2009, 06:01 PM
  #52  
Teching In
 
Richter Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: hanska
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Schwanke Engines...............hahahahahahahahaha!
Old 10-28-2009, 06:47 PM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Richter Racing
Schwanke Engines...............hahahahahahahahaha!
thanks for the informative post
Old 10-28-2009, 08:23 PM
  #54  
Teching In
 
Richter Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: hanska
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty obvious, not!?
Old 10-31-2009, 04:02 PM
  #55  
On The Tree
 
driver56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanke Engines
We have a USMTS A modified running the 4" stroke 415 to 7400 every single lap.

Do you mind telling who this is? I'm very interested in this as I'm doing an engine just to see how this will do in a modified. This first one is just a R&D kinda deal, 346/5.3-based with stock crank, forged rods and pistons, DART heads and a big COMP solid roller cam. If it can hold its own around here, I'll probably do a LSX block (390 or so c.i.) with all forged rotating parts and some kind of LS3/LS7 type of head. I think the little motor will be OK for races during the summer when the tracks slick over.
Old 11-01-2009, 06:09 AM
  #56  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Schwanke Engines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by driver56
Do you mind telling who this is? I'm very interested in this as I'm doing an engine just to see how this will do in a modified. This first one is just a R&D kinda deal, 346/5.3-based with stock crank, forged rods and pistons, DART heads and a big COMP solid roller cam. If it can hold its own around here, I'll probably do a LSX block (390 or so c.i.) with all forged rotating parts and some kind of LS3/LS7 type of head. I think the little motor will be OK for races during the summer when the tracks slick over.
Well, it is Chad and Scott Overgaard. They raced it for the last two years, but they really never go the car right up until the last couple races. They do more local racing than touring stuff.

We did have one customer put one in a car and ran the UMP Nationanls with it last year. He finished second and then they said no to it. More because he wanted an alumimun block and they really didn't like that. The overgaards are running a steel block.

GOod luck with what you are doing. I would recommend some more cubes as I think you will have a hard time keeping up with the 5.7L.

If you need any parts or have any questions, don't be afraid to give us a call.

Good Luck



Quick Reply: Budget 427



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.