Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Why don't more people run the lsx 454 crate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2010, 04:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why don't more people run the lsx 454 crate?

I'm curious as to why more people don't use this motor (other than money).

It seems to be an awesome deal...

454 cubes, 620 hp, LSX iron block, under $10k, and A WARRANTY !

What are your guys reasons for not going with this motor, because it seems like the perfect street car engine. ?
Old 12-13-2010, 06:22 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Jontall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

It is an awesome deal.
Old 12-13-2010, 06:42 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

I would have it if $ wasn't so short. Does GMPP balance these engines? It would be a shame not to balance it.
Old 12-13-2010, 07:15 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bozzhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: REALITY
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$

Dolla Dolla Dolla bill yalll....... ..... yes the long block is under $10000...... but if your building from scratch..... your looking at around $10000+ .... and with this economy, guys are usually building with just the tip of the head vs going ***** deep......


Bozz
Old 12-13-2010, 07:55 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
I would have it if $ wasn't so short. Does GMPP balance these engines? It would be a shame not to balance it.
I believe it's internally balanced.
Old 12-13-2010, 07:57 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bozzhawg
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$

Dolla Dolla Dolla bill yalll....... ..... yes the long block is under $10000...... but if your building from scratch..... your looking at around $10000+ .... and with this economy, guys are usually building with just the tip of the head vs going ***** deep......


Bozz

What are you saying? Engine/trans/rear end etc..?

B/c that's not what I was referring too. I'm talking about the people who have the money to build engines, and I'm wondering why more people don't use this crate.

Obviously, people who can't afford it are automatically out lol. Myself included (atm at least)
Old 12-13-2010, 09:01 PM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Cause it's a turd in my opinion...

620 hp with a HEAVY iron block and a carb intake? If you can't make 700 hp with a CARB intake, you should go back to the drawing board.

Check out the latest Hot Rod where they took a 468 with Mast heads and made 762 hp with a carb intake, 732 with a Fast intake, or 1.56 hp/cu in. It uses a much lighter aluminum block to boot.

My 454 made 705 hp with cathedral TFS heads and a Fast intake, which is 1.55 hp/cu in, but I have less compression and less cam than the 468 did.

Either way, if you can't make 1.55-1.6 hp/cu in, then you haven't done your homework.
The following users liked this post:
Honkymofo (02-10-2024)
Old 12-13-2010, 11:02 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
 
IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Your GF's pants
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
Cause it's a turd in my opinion...

620 hp with a HEAVY iron block and a carb intake? If you can't make 700 hp with a CARB intake, you should go back to the drawing board.

Check out the latest Hot Rod where they took a 468 with Mast heads and made 762 hp with a carb intake, 732 with a Fast intake, or 1.56 hp/cu in. It uses a much lighter aluminum block to boot.

My 454 made 705 hp with cathedral TFS heads and a Fast intake, which is 1.55 hp/cu in, but I have less compression and less cam than the 468 did.

Either way, if you can't make 1.55-1.6 hp/cu in, then you haven't done your homework.
+1 In my opinion stick with an aluminum block and 800 HP. Plus having the addition with the FI, you don't have to fiddle with all the b.s. on cold starts. I've been there and done that with my 400 Supercharged small block I built, and a 427. Too much hassle with carbration for too much money.
Old 12-14-2010, 05:14 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
WS6 Rampage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Money and the lack there of! Haha! ... Your gonna get this repsonse from everyone.
Old 12-14-2010, 07:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
nodrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

most people agree you can build a better engine for less money. I dont think its a turd after all I believe we are talking about 70 pound difference. If half the porkers in here can loose that much weight. LOL dont get but hurt guys. But I dont disagree lighter is better. 620 is not enough for 10k IMO
Old 12-14-2010, 10:43 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bozzhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: REALITY
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro_built7
What are you saying? Engine/trans/rear end etc..?

B/c that's not what I was referring too. I'm talking about the people who have the money to build engines, and I'm wondering why more people don't use this crate.

Obviously, people who can't afford it are automatically out lol. Myself included (atm at least)
What I am saying is, unless you have most of the parts like LS7 topend (intake,TB,etc...) or carb intake to fit the said heads for the swap etc...then it maybe not that bad... but if your starting from scratch, it can get costly....

Just think about this, how many LS7's and I mean true LS7's running around here..... Not more than 5.3's,5.7's,6.0's,6.2's etc... whether it be a stroker or not... The main issue is money or cost, even a guy who has more resources, they mostly will tend to look for the best bang for the buck.....

Its a basic business model or market cycle.... supply and demand..... The markert is always working toward an equalibrium for the right price where supply=demand..... But where ever the equalibrium is, it shifts along the curve whether it be a downward shift or and outward shift, this will affect price...
ie..... if demand is greater than supply or supply is less than demand, then the price will generally be higher.... But in converse, if the supply is greater than demand, than the price will generally be less......

demand > than supply= ie shortage which causes higher prices
supply < than demand= same

supply > than demand= ie surplus which causes prices to fall
supply > than demand= more 5.3's,5.7's,6.0's,6.2's available helps keep prices lower for these goods and options. These cores are everywhere and filling up the junkyards...... plus GM is producing these at a faster rate than the said LS7 in production cars.... and the LSX454 is not being produced in factory production, so it turns into a luxary good or product.....

I could draw you a model but I will save you the guano, by the way, I have a Bachelors in Economics....lol

Bluecollar guys are not the only ones feeling the effects of Bushonomics..... also give the 454 some time, it is still relatively early since they were made public.... I mean its only been what 1-2 years?

So give it some time the LS7 still has not been utilized in mass production as greatly as the 5.3's,6.0's,6.2's even stroker combo's....
For years the LSX swap was often avoided due to the cost but since there is a surplus of cores now and a multiple of aftermarket vendors, the swap or options have been more affordable.....

remeber only 4% of the US makes more than $100000 a year...... the rest or aka middle class which is shrinking everyday, and the rest or poor......

Bozz
Old 12-14-2010, 11:21 AM
  #12  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here are a few reasons why

1. It does not come with an intake from GM.
2. It does not come with a windage tray, oil pan, pickup tube, dip stick, dipstick tube.
3. It does not come with coils.
4. The valve covers on it do not support mounting the coils onto the covers making remote mount necessary.
5. It comes with LS7 heads as the only option. (The 454R is actually a DR headed version now, but supposed to be tall deck so....another story.)
6. It comes with a very specific crankshaft. 8 bolt. Meaning no other GM flywheel or flexplate will work for it. (save for the LSA which has not been confirmed as of yet).
7. It is still advertised as a tall deck even though it is not.
8. Cyl heads need some love to make them produce bigger numbers.
9. The cam could be different, but if you change it, there goes the warranty.
10. We can build a custom 454LSX for roughly the same price as this one in the trim its in.
Old 12-14-2010, 03:33 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bozzhawg
What I am saying is, unless you have most of the parts like LS7 topend (intake,TB,etc...) or carb intake to fit the said heads for the swap etc...then it maybe not that bad... but if your starting from scratch, it can get costly....

Just think about this, how many LS7's and I mean true LS7's running around here..... Not more than 5.3's,5.7's,6.0's,6.2's etc... whether it be a stroker or not... The main issue is money or cost, even a guy who has more resources, they mostly will tend to look for the best bang for the buck.....

Its a basic business model or market cycle.... supply and demand..... The markert is always working toward an equalibrium for the right price where supply=demand..... But where ever the equalibrium is, it shifts along the curve whether it be a downward shift or and outward shift, this will affect price...
ie..... if demand is greater than supply or supply is less than demand, then the price will generally be higher.... But in converse, if the supply is greater than demand, than the price will generally be less......

demand > than supply= ie shortage which causes higher prices
supply < than demand= same

supply > than demand= ie surplus which causes prices to fall
supply > than demand= more 5.3's,5.7's,6.0's,6.2's available helps keep prices lower for these goods and options. These cores are everywhere and filling up the junkyards...... plus GM is producing these at a faster rate than the said LS7 in production cars.... and the LSX454 is not being produced in factory production, so it turns into a luxary good or product.....

I could draw you a model but I will save you the guano, by the way, I have a Bachelors in Economics....lol

Bluecollar guys are not the only ones feeling the effects of Bushonomics..... also give the 454 some time, it is still relatively early since they were made public.... I mean its only been what 1-2 years?

So give it some time the LS7 still has not been utilized in mass production as greatly as the 5.3's,6.0's,6.2's even stroker combo's....
For years the LSX swap was often avoided due to the cost but since there is a surplus of cores now and a multiple of aftermarket vendors, the swap or options have been more affordable.....

remeber only 4% of the US makes more than $100000 a year...... the rest or aka middle class which is shrinking everyday, and the rest or poor......

Bozz

........So what would be a better option to the lsx 454
Old 12-14-2010, 03:36 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
Here are a few reasons why

1. It does not come with an intake from GM.
2. It does not come with a windage tray, oil pan, pickup tube, dip stick, dipstick tube.
3. It does not come with coils.
4. The valve covers on it do not support mounting the coils onto the covers making remote mount necessary.
5. It comes with LS7 heads as the only option. (The 454R is actually a DR headed version now, but supposed to be tall deck so....another story.)
6. It comes with a very specific crankshaft. 8 bolt. Meaning no other GM flywheel or flexplate will work for it. (save for the LSA which has not been confirmed as of yet).
7. It is still advertised as a tall deck even though it is not.
8. Cyl heads need some love to make them produce bigger numbers.
9. The cam could be different, but if you change it, there goes the warranty.
10. We can build a custom 454LSX for roughly the same price as this one in the trim its in.


What would be the cost of a complete (Ie. including intake) of a well built 454 ? You're saying you could build one for less then $10k ?
Old 12-14-2010, 03:44 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bozzhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: REALITY
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro_built7
........So what would be a better option to the lsx 454
Whatever your pockets can afford..... Its cool to talk in the "what if" but in the real world it depends on the intent of the car and pocketbook...

If you want to know why the rich don't buy them, then your probably in the wrong forum.....lol......

most guys here have more time than money, including myself...


Bozz
Old 12-14-2010, 03:49 PM
  #16  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
217zenki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I can think of lots of things to do with 10k that beats the hell out of the 454.. H/c and strippers.
Old 12-14-2010, 04:43 PM
  #17  
FormerVendor
 
Billy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
Here are a few reasons why

1. It does not come with an intake from GM.
2. It does not come with a windage tray, oil pan, pickup tube, dip stick, dipstick tube.
3. It does not come with coils.
4. The valve covers on it do not support mounting the coils onto the covers making remote mount necessary.
5. It comes with LS7 heads as the only option. (The 454R is actually a DR headed version now, but supposed to be tall deck so....another story.)
6. It comes with a very specific crankshaft. 8 bolt. Meaning no other GM flywheel or flexplate will work for it. (save for the LSA which has not been confirmed as of yet).
7. It is still advertised as a tall deck even though it is not.
8. Cyl heads need some love to make them produce bigger numbers.
9. The cam could be different, but if you change it, there goes the warranty.
10. We can build a custom 454LSX for roughly the same price as this one in the trim its in.
Uhh we have #6 Covered in the flywheel dept. P/N 460538. Made specifically for the LSX 454 and LS-A Motors.
Old 12-14-2010, 05:14 PM
  #18  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billy M
Uhh we have #6 Covered in the flywheel dept. P/N 460538. Made specifically for the LSX 454 and LS-A Motors.
I know that part. I think we have one here already! Ha. I mean as far as interchangeability between GM models of cars trucks etc. Also, we need more RSTs! Lol.

Being able to find parts for an engine from another person on tech or the salvage yard makes engines more desirable to most people I talk to. But then again, some would rather have good quality new parts as well. That is where ya'll come in.

And by no means am I taking a shot at the GMPP LSX454. It is a very good engine. It works well and produces good power. I am just stating the comments I normally get for them. They have a GM warranty though, which is really 2nd to none.
Old 12-14-2010, 06:27 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Pro_built7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
I know that part. I think we have one here already! Ha. I mean as far as interchangeability between GM models of cars trucks etc. Also, we need more RSTs! Lol.

Being able to find parts for an engine from another person on tech or the salvage yard makes engines more desirable to most people I talk to. But then again, some would rather have good quality new parts as well. That is where ya'll come in.

And by no means am I taking a shot at the GMPP LSX454. It is a very good engine. It works well and produces good power. I am just stating the comments I normally get for them. They have a GM warranty though, which is really 2nd to none.
So.. back to my question
Old 12-14-2010, 06:32 PM
  #20  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A custom built engine as is from us using the LSX block with say callies products for the crank and rods and a number of different pistons and the GM LSX-LS7 heads would run about the same cost. Including all you see there. It depends on what you want in the grand scheme as to what the total cost would be. Lay it out for me and I can get you a ball park.


Quick Reply: Why don't more people run the lsx 454 crate?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.