Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

l92/ls3 vs. ported 5.3 on a lq4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2011 | 12:38 PM
  #1  
360demonRT's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default l92/ls3 vs. ported 5.3 on a lq4

I've spent the better part of the morning searching for an answer and havent had any luck. im trying to piece together a build and am trying to figure out which direction to go.

stock milled ls3/l92 or prc 2.5 5.3's.

lq4 shortblock, rod bolted, only acc is going to be an alternator.
the appropriate vic jr (going in a g-body Malibu)
4150 tb
1 7/8 LT's
built th350, 4500-5000 stall.
3.73
3300 race weight
custom max effort n/a cam from one of our fine vendors, shifting no higher than 7k rpm.

which head would net me a better 1/4 mile time, and why? any ballparks to what that time would be? shooting for a solid 10
Old 05-09-2011 | 05:49 PM
  #2  
briancb1's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Default

What's your budget? Both can kick *** but LS3 topends can be done on a tight budget. I don't see the 5.3's getting up to te full potential w/o porting and a fast intake (more $$$). You can do what you are looking for both ways.
Old 05-09-2011 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
360demonRT's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

I don't have a set budget, whichever I end up with, it will be bought as i get the money. I'm still in the planning stages. No matter which head head I go with, it will be topped with a Vic. Jr., and a 4150tb. Everything is pretty much in concrete, except the heads... It's good to know that I'm not shooting my expectations too high. I'm not after a HP number at all. Just that it pulls the number at the track.
Old 05-09-2011 | 10:52 PM
  #4  
ChucksZ06's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 1
Default

Go with the ls3 if you are using a victor...they will make more hp at higher rpm with that manifold.
Old 05-10-2011 | 06:43 AM
  #5  
WKMCD's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Default

The cam required to make good power is going to be VERY different for those two heads.
Old 05-10-2011 | 10:32 AM
  #6  
360demonRT's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

Yeap. That's the main reason I'm waiting to decide which head, before i look into cams. The cam will be a custom spec, just for the sole reason I don't know alot about cam theory and only want to do this build once, that and I'd like to be able to milk every drop out of this engine that I can, while keeping it at a decent RPM.
Old 05-10-2011 | 10:56 AM
  #7  
Quick Sh0t xMLx's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
Default

L92s is where it's at. They're making stupid power for the price.
Old 05-10-2011 | 11:30 AM
  #8  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

if your after high compression the, the 5.3s can yield up to or over 11:1 milled with thinner gaskets.
the l92 heads even milled also used with thin gaskets will be short of 11:1.
maybe up to 10.5:1
remember that if your going for max effort on this engine, cutting vr in the pistons is almost mandatory, at least imo.
i dont install large duration cams without cutting in vr and verifying ptv clearance in any engine.
i like to run the tightest quench possible. .035-.040 range. and highest scr/dcr possible. which gives way for larger duration cams and and high rpm shift points. 7000+
Old 05-10-2011 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
360demonRT's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

which set of heads will run the better times though? 5.3's at 11-1 or ls3 at 10.5-1, is that 1/2 a compression point going to put the 5.3's on top? It's going to be as max effort as the combo can be, while fitting inside the specs of what I want. 93 pump gas, just streetable enough so that it wouldn't overheat in traffic and I'd prefer to not have to flycut, thats just another reason for the custom cam. if the man specing the cam says I'm going to be leaving a ton on the table by working around that, then break out the junk head, valve and sandpaper and get after it.
Old 05-09-2013 | 12:34 AM
  #10  
Chi_weezy's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 360demonRT
which set of heads will run the better times though? 5.3's at 11-1 or ls3 at 10.5-1, is that 1/2 a compression point going to put the 5.3's on top? It's going to be as max effort as the combo can be, while fitting inside the specs of what I want. 93 pump gas, just streetable enough so that it wouldn't overheat in traffic and I'd prefer to not have to flycut, thats just another reason for the custom cam. if the man specing the cam says I'm going to be leaving a ton on the table by working around that, then break out the junk head, valve and sandpaper and get after it.
What heads did you go with? I'm in the exact same boat. Need help picking!
Old 05-12-2013 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
low2001gmc's Avatar
MASS seller approved
15 Year Member
iTrader: (148)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 136
From: ELSA, South TEXAS (956) 802-7700
Default

ls3 top end better. i believe i offered my opinion for you on another thread but if i didnt, would be more than glad to help out....just pm me....
Old 05-13-2013 | 11:06 PM
  #12  
Chi_weezy's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Still no answer to this question though. Better qm time: l92 or 2.5 5.3's? I'm in the same boat. PRC's come with titanium retainers and dual valve springs for $1,300, and the Ls3/L92 heads come with oem retainers\springs etc. so that's more money you'd have to spend on those which are about $800 for the set bare.

So basically the heads are the same price. But the ls3 intake seems to be cheaper than the ls6 for the 2.5's.

Either way, I'm leaning toward the higher compression 5.3's recommended by TSP although the L92's were my original pick and are slightly cheaper. Ahhhh!!!!!
Old 05-14-2013 | 08:10 AM
  #13  
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 7
From: Bardstown, KY
Default

The outcome is going to depend on how you execute each combination.

The cathedral combo will have a fairly conventional camshaft, which will have less overlap. It will be easier to install on stock pistons.

To make the LS3 heads work well on that size engine will require more overlap, which will hurt P to V dramatically. My best advise would be to run the LS3 with the Victor Jr for making power, and then consider a set of the Wiseco junkyard dog pistons. They have a small dome to raise compression and the valve reliefs that you'll desperately need.
Old 05-14-2013 | 09:46 AM
  #14  
87silverbullet's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 8
From: Slidell,LA
Default

Read up son.


https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...am-10-80s.html
Old 05-15-2013 | 02:34 AM
  #15  
360demonRT's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

Yea. No results. Everything i try takes a **** in my face... So now I have a title-less car, a scrap motor and pretty much a bunch of stuff I can't use. Buying ahouse or trying too, so can't afford itthe toys for the next year or so. I swear, one day I'm going to have a LS based turbo Malibu. One day :-/



Quick Reply: l92/ls3 vs. ported 5.3 on a lq4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.