Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

AFR 230v2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 11:06 PM
  #1  
FlamingTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default AFR 230v2

I just bought a new set of AFR 230v2 large bore 62cc heads. I know that the new 230v2's is a new cnc program on the 225's. When I received the new heads they have "LSx 225 62cc V2" engraved on the sides. Just want to make sure they are the new model. Thanks.

Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #2  
DaFireMan's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Chilly Gentilly
Default

I would call an ask them. May be an honest mistake if there is a mistake. Give them a ring.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 11:14 PM
  #3  
yelo04goat's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
Default

might of just had some old cores there that they ran the new program on...

make the call find out for sure..
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 04:12 AM
  #4  
ctd's Avatar
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 632
Likes: 2
From: Sicamous, BC
Default

I just checked mine, they were installed last winter. They are marked the same as yours 225.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 06:34 AM
  #5  
FlamingTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by ctd
I just checked mine, they were installed last winter. They are marked the same as yours 225.
And you bought the 230v2's?

If so I guess they need to update their engraving program.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #6  
ctd's Avatar
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 632
Likes: 2
From: Sicamous, BC
Default

Yes mine are 230 V2's. Waited a long time for them.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 01:16 PM
  #7  
WADDISME's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Default

I was going to do the 230s but didn't have the time to wait so I went with TFS 225s. Curious to see some numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #8  
FMX05's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
Default

Email AFR's sales department and give them the number on the barcode. That's the build number. They can tell you everything about the heads including ordered chamber size and who they were ordered through. I just had them help me out with a set of used 225's I bought.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Sorry to bring this one back, but what is the difference between the big bore and small bore versions of this head besides the obvious. AFRs website doesn't detail which versions are for what bore sizes.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #10  
gto_ua's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
Sorry to bring this one back, but what is the difference between the big bore and small bore versions of this head besides the obvious. AFRs website doesn't detail which versions are for what bore sizes.
Big bore is intended for 4.06+ applications

small bore works ok with 4+ bore

basically - small bore for ls2+
big bore for ls3,ls7+
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2011 | 11:23 AM
  #11  
kkslds's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Coffeyville, Ks
Default

Originally Posted by gto_ua
Big bore is intended for 4.06+ applications

small bore works ok with 4+ bore

basically - small bore for ls2+
big bore for ls3,ls7+
Small bore is for 3.900

large bore is for 4.125
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
gto_ua's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kkslds
Small bore is for 3.900

large bore is for 4.125
Oh really?

Your thoughts dont mean the truth...

What I wrote is how those models should be used in practice.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #13  
FlamingTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gto_ua
Oh really?

Your thoughts dont mean the truth...

What I wrote is how those models should be used in practice.
And your thoughts do? I'm just saying, don't dog another persons thoughts when your's haven't been proven.

There is going to be alot of overlap here. I will be running the big bore on my 4.030" bore. 3.9 and 4.125 is a given on which one would work better. the 4.0-4.07 is where I bet they will both work almost the same, slight flow differences but pretty close.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2011 | 09:01 PM
  #14  
kkslds's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Coffeyville, Ks
Default

Originally Posted by gto_ua
Oh really?

Your thoughts dont mean the truth...

What I wrote is how those models should be used in practice.

I posted what is used in the test examples directly from AFR's website. Obviously they are suited well enough to be used in practice with the bores I stated since that is what they advertise with.

I never said that it was "ideal" for any specific setup, but merely wanted readers to know that it was a possibility to use these heads on a LS1/LS6 combination since it was asked what the difference was. You posted YOUR OPINION on what was ideal and I posted what AFR says will work.

http://www.airflowresearch.com/index.php?cPath=76_78
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.