LS7 piston in LS1 connecting rod...
How to know the LS1 piston dtailed information (Compression hight, pin diameter, skirt length, etc...)
Thanks...
The LS1 rod has a .945" pin and the LS7 piston uses a .925" pin. A machine shop could hone it to .945" and use it with an LS1 pin, unless the length is different.
The compression height is something like 1.175", so with a 6.098" rod and a 4" stroke crank, you're sticking the piston roughly .033" above the deck. You would either need the pistons cut down to reduce compression height or use a thicker Cometics gasket to get quench distance back to a safe level.
For what you're paying a machine shop to do all of that, you may as well buy the correct rods/pistons.
The block will be topped with L92 heads, where I will be milling the head to about 0.040" to pump the compression up.
The original LS7 Piston compression hight is 1.173"
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.067" (LS7 Connecting Rod) + 2" (LS7 Stroke /2) = 9.24" Block Hight.
The original LS1 Piston compression hight is 1.331"
1.331" (LS1 Piston C.H.) + 6.098" (LS1 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.24" Block Hight.
Option 1, if I used the LS7 piston on stock LS1 connecting rods & stock LS1 crankshaft:
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.098" (LS1 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.082"
Difference Between Block High and Rotating Assessmbly = 9.24" - 9.082" = 0.158"
Option 2, if I used the LS7 piston on stock LS7 connecting rods & stock LS1 crankshaft:
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.067" (LS7 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.051"
Difference Between Block High and Rotating Assessmbly = 9.24" - 9.051" = 0.189"
Will there be difference in compression ration in option 1 & 2? I think this 0.158" & 0.189" will be added value since I'm milling the heads and will protect the valves heads from hitting the piston, but on the other hand, there will be cost of honing the rod to pin correct size for the 0.158" while in the 0.189" does not require. Please any other thoughts ...
Thanks after all
Last edited by LS6; Dec 3, 2011 at 03:16 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The block will be topped with L92 heads, where I will be milling the head to about 0.040" to pump the compression up.
The original LS7 Piston compression hight is 1.173"
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.067" (LS7 Connecting Rod) + 2" (LS7 Stroke /2) = 9.24" Block Hight.
The original LS1 Piston compression hight is 1.331"
1.331" (LS1 Piston C.H.) + 6.098" (LS1 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.24" Block Hight.
Option 1, if I used the LS7 piston on stock LS1 connecting rods & stock LS1 crankshaft:
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.098" (LS1 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.082"
Difference Between Block High and Rotating Assessmbly = 9.24" - 9.082" = 0.158"
Option 2, if I used the LS7 piston on stock LS7 connecting rods & stock LS1 crankshaft:
1.173" (LS7 Piston C.H.) + 6.067" (LS7 Connecting Rod) + 1.811" (LS1 Stroke /2) = 9.051"
Difference Between Block High and Rotating Assessmbly = 9.24" - 9.051" = 0.189"
Will there be difference in compression ration in option 1 & 2? I think this 0.158" & 0.189" will be added value since I'm milling the heads and will protect the valves heads from hitting the piston, but on the other hand, there will be cost of honing the rod to pin correct size for the 0.158" while in the 0.189" does not require. Please any other thoughts ...
Thanks after all
You might want to talk to your machine shop. I don't believe you can dry sleeve an LS1 for a 4.125 inch bore as they are the only ones with coolant between the individual holes and factory liners are thin. LS2 and later blocks are siamesed between bores and can accept a larger liner. Key is the liner OD, not ID - LS1 just does not have enough metal there.
Only real option for LS1 block and 4.125 bore is a wet sleeve. This is a much more difficult install and probably a local guy is not the best choice for this. RED or ERL would be a good choice but be advised this is not a cheap job.
It seem that no one done a engine of bore(4.125") X stroke(3.622") with connecting rod of 6.098" before...
Thanks...
If I can not find the 4.125" piston's, I think I will go with the LS3 Piston's. I want to see the sleeving integrity is sound good and to use the engine for high RPM. Could you please elaborate more about the combination issue...
Thanks...
I went with the LS3 piston (4.0845" bore) with the same pin diameter of LS3 stock and compression hight of 1.330". The machine shop ensured with this re-sleeving, I can go to 4.150" as maximum, but the 4.125" & 4.15" bore piston's are not avilabe as shelf items.
I will be later on my next project ordering a custom pistons of 4.15" bore.







