Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Importance of bay-to-bay breathing windows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2012, 10:53 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bad News22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Importance of bay-to-bay breathing windows

I am wondering how important the bay-to-bay windows are in the LS block. I am in the middle of a 1200+hp build and want to make sure I start with the right platform. My original plan was to use an RHS block but it seems that they are on backorder for almost ever and have a huge waiting list. My second option would be to use a 5.3L gen IV block core and have it sent to either RED or ERL for sleeve work. My understanding with the 5.3L block is that is lacks the bay-to-bay breathing windows found in other LS blocks but is a little stronger because of it. A spoke with an engine builder awhile back that said they would never consider a block without the windows to be used in a shallow oil pan application like in a Corvette such as mine. My question is how much do those windows play a role in things if I run a full EVAC system and constantly be pulling vacuum on the case? I have heard that in a regular wetsump system with no EVAC that the loss of windows results in a 50hp loss.
Old 02-07-2012, 09:07 AM
  #2  
Rockstar
iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny-LT1-runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I'm on a boat! in Shreveport, La
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

An oiling system is not going to cost you HP like that...besides if you want to use a 5.3 for that sort of power, you are starting off way wrong.
Old 02-07-2012, 10:52 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bad News22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am not saying that the oiling system will cause a hp loss like that. I reputable engine builder shop has done some back to back testing and come up with a loss from a block without the bay-to-bay windows. I will not be using a 5.3L motor for that kind of power. It will be a sleeved 427 possibly utilizing a 5.3L block core.
Old 02-12-2012, 08:35 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
Pumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bay to Bay breathing is very important!

Wait for the RHS block. Talk to the folks at Flatlander Racing and see if they have any RHS blocks in stock.

The oiling system on LS engines is TERRIBLE! Most individuals and engine shops I have read about on this Forum do not realize and/or deal with this issue.

Oil Return: The block and cylinder head drain back design on the LS engine thows oil onto the connecting rod journals as they are spinning at 6,000 + rpms and the oil gets turned into foam, then the foam gets thrown back up into the cylinder heads, and the valley. This overloads the ability of the oil to return to the pan and keeps too much of it suspended into the heads or blown out of the valley cover tube and into the intake manifold.

Main and Rod Oiling: The LS engine does not have main bearing and rod bearing priority oiling. The RHS block was designed for main and rod priority oiling. The standard GM Gen III and Gen IV oil pumps start to cavitate above 6,200 rpms. Melling makes three pumps that are significantly better than the GM pumps:





There isn't room in this post, but an article on correcting the design deficiencies of the LS engine's oiling system should be posted on this Forum.


Last edited by Pumba; 03-21-2012 at 01:03 PM.
Old 02-12-2012, 09:56 AM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
koolrayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: mansfield ohio
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Pumba, I agree completely but am wondering where that chart came from?
Old 02-12-2012, 12:06 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
Pumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by koolrayz
Pumba, I agree completely, but am wondering where that chart came from?

Koolrayz,

I was given the data for the chart by a personal friend who works for an OEM oil pump supplier. I will not divulge the source, but the data is accurate.


Old 02-12-2012, 12:36 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
chrisfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phx the cactus patch
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Wow I would imagine that would explain alot for a whole bunch of guys on here ,,,,,,,,,like why their engine died ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and how to prevent it from happening again .
Old 02-12-2012, 12:57 PM
  #8  
Rockstar
iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny-LT1-runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I'm on a boat! in Shreveport, La
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most people on their second engines run a Melling. I do.
Old 02-12-2012, 01:02 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
Pumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johnny-LT1-runner
Most people on their second engines run a Melling. I do.

That's a good first step.

As you can see from the chart above, the Melling 365 and 10355 pumps are significantly better than the Melling 10296 pump that most LS owners upgrade to.
Old 02-12-2012, 03:44 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pumba
Koolrayz,

I was given the data for the chart by a personal friend who works for an OEM oil pump supplier. I will not divulge the source, but the data is accurate.


I'm gonna take a stab in the dark here and just throw out a guess.... ooooh, I don't know... maybe.....Melling?
Old 02-13-2012, 10:02 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bad News22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

RHS blocks are on backorder for quite a while
Old 02-13-2012, 06:19 PM
  #12  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Are you talking about the slight climb at high rpm when you say better?

Kurt
Originally Posted by Pumba
That's a good first step.

As you can see from the chart above, the Melling 365 and 10355 pumps are significantly better than the Melling 10296 pump that most LS owners upgrade to.
Old 02-13-2012, 08:15 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
Pumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427
Are you talking about the slight climb at high rpm when you say better?

Kurt


Kurt,

I am referring to the increased output volumes of the 365 and 10355 pumps and the fact that their flow does not fall off above 6,200 rpms.

Old 02-13-2012, 08:22 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Towards the pump - In one sentence it says the oil can't return at high rpm then it is recommended to run a pump that feeds alot more oil? Wouldn't it all stay in the head and just dry out the pan?

For the OP- I would wait for the block or the other option is to do a resleeved LS2 block. I just did one for my personal 1200-1400rwhp car.
Old 02-13-2012, 08:36 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
Pumba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Towards the pump - In one sentence it says the oil can't return at high rpm then it is recommended to run a pump that feeds alot more oil? Wouldn't it all stay in the head and just dry out the pan?

For the OP- I would wait for the block or the other option is to do a resleeved LS2 block. I just did one for my personal 1200-1400rwhp car.

What does "Towards the pump" mean?

NO, it does not say that the oil can't return at high rpm. The graph shows that the standard GM pumps cavitate the oil above 6,200 rpms, causing the output of the pump to fall.

The LS2 block is not a solution without significant modifications to its oil drain back characteristics and the drain back characteristics of the cylinder heads.

"Most individuals and engine shops I have read about on this Forum do not realize and/or deal with this issue." - Self analyze.


Last edited by Pumba; 02-14-2012 at 07:17 AM.
Old 02-14-2012, 06:37 AM
  #16  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't speak for a block without 'em, but I did get to watch a few dyno pulls a few years back with an LX454. Made great power, builder was hyped in anticipation of how much it would pick up with an evac system.
Zilch, zip, nada. Tried in in a few different configurations with the same results every time.
The bays allow that heavy air/oil hurricane mix to exit sideways (it's actually pulled and pushed through at the same time) rather than having to be pushed all the way around.
Old 02-14-2012, 09:03 AM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Towards the pump - In one sentence it says the oil can't return at high rpm then it is recommended to run a pump that feeds alot more oil? Wouldn't it all stay in the head and just dry out the pan?

For the OP- I would wait for the block or the other option is to do a resleeved LS2 block. I just did one for my personal 1200-1400rwhp car.
^^^This has been done many times over. People have been resleeving the aluminum blocks for high horsepower applications and have been running perfectly fine.

Originally Posted by Pumba
What does "Towards the pump" mean?

NO, it does not say that the oil can't return at high rpm. The graph shows that the standard GM pumps cavitate the oil above 6,200 rpms, causing the output of the pump to fall.

The LS2 block is not a solution without significant modifications to its oil drain back characteristics and the drain back characteristics of the cylinder heads.

"Most individuals and engine shops I have read about on this Forum do not realize and/or deal with this issue." - Self analyze.

You say that modifications have to be done to the block and heads for the drain back charteristics yet there are guys turning massive rpm with stock blocks. You numbers, charts, and words sound convincing but I my self have been turning a stock block 346 to 7600 rpms for 4 years with a ported ls6 pump and have never seen my oil pressure drop off. Don't you think my motor would of been toast by now if your words were true?

Did you ask Kurt what he does to modify the oiling characteristics of all those stock block motors he builds? I know the people he give the motors back to don't turn them to 6200 and stop.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:19 AM
  #18  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Increased output does not help most engines, and can hurt some. Loose aluminum engines will use 6-7gpm, the iron stuff normally will stay below 3gpm except for some drag stuff that is purposely loose. The excess oil will increase oil pressure at low speed, that could be good in a high load towing engine but increased volume without increased need is counter productive. It creates heat and turbulence with hp. If you couple high volume pump with stock pan capacity you will pump the pan dry and cause engine bearing failure.

Kurt
Originally Posted by Pumba
Kurt,

I am referring to the increased output volumes of the 365 and 10355 pumps and the fact that their flow does not fall off above 6,200 rpms.




Quick Reply: Importance of bay-to-bay breathing windows



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.