Mast 235 vs trickflow 235
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
The point is don't just make your decision on specs because there is a lot more involved than port size and CFM on the flow bench. The key is port velocity which does not show up on the flow bench.
There is test this month between two Mast heads in GM High Tech Performance magazine. The smaller cathedral port LS1/2 head and the bigger square port LS3 head . The square port head tested at ~30 CFM more than the smaller cathedral port heads. Guess what? They made almost the power within a couple of HP but the cathedral port delivered much better low RPM torque.
Forget the specs. My LS2 with GM 243 heads CNC by Lingenfelter and a very small GT-11 cam made 473 rwhp recently.
Also check out the TF225.
Last edited by Mez; Apr 22, 2012 at 07:28 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time






