Mast 235 vs trickflow 235
#1
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mast 235 vs trickflow 235
this is what i pretty much have it narrowed to for heads on a ls2 402 4in. stroke and bore, post up what you think but post WHY !! dont just say "mast" "trickflow" give a reason..
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
#2
this is what i pretty much have it narrowed to for heads on a ls2 402 4in. stroke and bore, post up what you think but post WHY !! dont just say "mast" "trickflow" give a reason..
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
#3
Remember their flowbench will all flow differently. ie different #s from the exact same head. I noticed TEA does advertise high exh. numbers. I would just get the 235TFS from TEA
#6
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is what i pretty much have it narrowed to for heads on a ls2 402 4in. stroke and bore, post up what you think but post WHY !! dont just say "mast" "trickflow" give a reason..
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
now the Trickflow "advertises" like 8 more CFM at .600 than mast, but who knows if their numbers are bogus on TEA's website, they have some pretty rediculous exhaust flow advertisement....
but also, the MAST is an 11 degree head where as the trickflow is a 13 degree head
The point is don't just make your decision on specs because there is a lot more involved than port size and CFM on the flow bench. The key is port velocity which does not show up on the flow bench.
There is test this month between two Mast heads in GM High Tech Performance magazine. The smaller cathedral port LS1/2 head and the bigger square port LS3 head . The square port head tested at ~30 CFM more than the smaller cathedral port heads. Guess what? They made almost the power within a couple of HP but the cathedral port delivered much better low RPM torque.
Forget the specs. My LS2 with GM 243 heads CNC by Lingenfelter and a very small GT-11 cam made 473 rwhp recently.
Also check out the TF225.
Last edited by Mez; 04-22-2012 at 07:28 AM.
#7
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think you can go wrong with either head. Both are going to make good power. Long as you buy the right parts for your setup name brand isnt really going to matter. When you are talking about top quality parts trickflow, mast, afr and others like that, it isnt going to matter. If you are talking budget heads vs a top name then yes it will be harder to obtain the big power numbers.
Trending Topics
#8
I write checks with my mouth that my ass can't cash
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Iv been talking to someone from mast thru PM on here, and he wants me to go with the 245, when i asked him why for my 4 inch bore he said because its not stock displacement, he said he would recommend the 215 or a 235 with a stock displacement he said for a bigger cube motor like mine a 245 is the way to go
#10