would titanium valves make gains
LS-3 package. Mild cam (similar to ASA) stock stroke and bore
stock Rockers.1:7:1
springs are free valves/seats are free retainers( but must have same physical dimensions as stock).
push rods, and lifters are free.
no port no polish 10:7:1 comp rev limited at 6800.
Starting with bare ls-3 head castings. taking weight out of the valve train with Titanium valve, would it gain over a sodium filled valve for example.
Plan is to run a beehive. PSI 1511, Comp 918, or PAC 1218 or 1219 valve spring with Titanium retainers.
The valve seats are as important in the application as the valve .What valve seat would you recommend with Sodium or Titanium valve. 2.165 intake 1.59 exhaust. 4.9 length. I believe that is factory spec.
Looking for gains in a spec package. Where do you see it?
FWIW These engines will be flogged not driven on the street
I will check weights on valves I believe Titanium is lighter but I need to get that number. Cost is always a factor but not a driving force here. I would enjoy the byproduct of value for result but the result is what I am after. I am trending with the current political mode "I plan on addressing the cost later" I just want the result now.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
in my search I have found titanium valves but they are to big for the spec. I have found Manley and the like products in Titanium at 2.170 The spec I need is 2.165 What seat materials would be available and complementary to Titanium valves. Beryllium or is there another recommendation. Retainers in Titanium are not hard to source. Does any one have experience with Chrome alloy push ? Is there a gain through thinner wall push rods?
I have done a little LS-1 stuff but that package was essentially already developed. We did not use Titanium stuff in those heads (243's) The rods were stock and the lifters were ls-7.
Head flow is limited by casting. As was the case in the ls-1 package. Just trying to fling some stuff out to generate feedback that could save me two or three generations of development progress.
Oiling is the key on these deals what are the techniques used on the LS-3 case to create better oiling. or are they just run what you brung, GM got it figured out? A Melling oil pump is in this build
As for oiling, if you can use a dry sump, do it! ARE makes a pan than utilizes the traditional oil pump as a scavenge from the reservoir, which is neat. You just add an external pump with however many stages you need to scavenge from the engine to the reservoir. The LS motors are bad about aerated oil, which I suspect is the reason they released dry dumps in their factory corvettes. If a dry sump is prohibited, an Accusump will be the next best option.
Also, a dry sump takes more hp to run than a normal wet sump.
The OP stated in the first post that the RPM limit is 6800, at this rpm I see no perfomance advantage to spending money on valves.








